Research Methods & Reporting
AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both
BMJ 2017; 358 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j4008 (Published 21 September 2017) Cite this as: BMJ 2017;358:j4008
Data supplement
Web extra
- Data Supplement - Supplementary figure: the AMSTAR 2 instrument
- Data Supplement - Supplementary appendix 1: AMSTAR 2 guidance document
- Data Supplement - Supplementary appendix 2: Inter-rater reliability of AMSTAR 2 items and references for studies included in the analyses
Web extra
- Data Supplement - Supplementary figure: the AMSTAR 2 instrument
- Data Supplement - Supplementary appendix 1: AMSTAR 2 guidance document
- Data Supplement - Supplementary appendix 2: Inter-rater reliability of AMSTAR 2 items and references for studies included in the analyses
Related articles
- Research Methods & Reporting Published: 05 February 2010; BMJ 340 doi:10.1136/bmj.c221
- Education And Debate Published: 03 September 1994; BMJ 309 doi:10.1136/bmj.309.6954.597
- Research Methods & Reporting Published: 12 October 2016; BMJ 355 doi:10.1136/bmj.i4919
- Paper Published: 29 May 2003; BMJ 326 doi:10.1136/bmj.326.7400.1167
- Research Methods & Reporting Published: 18 October 2011; BMJ 343 doi:10.1136/bmj.d5928
- Research Published: 16 July 2010; BMJ 341 doi:10.1136/bmj.c3515
- Education And Debate Published: 10 January 1998; BMJ 316 doi:10.1136/bmj.316.7125.140
See more
- Brexit: European health experts emphasise dangers to patient safety of no dealBMJ September 16, 2019, 366 l5583; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l5583
- Sixty seconds on . . . data hubsBMJ September 16, 2019, 366 l5581; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l5581
- Caring for migrant populations in general practice: five minutes with . . . Jessica CarterBMJ September 16, 2019, 366 l5577; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l5577
- Legally protecting apologies shrinks the clinician-patient relationshipBMJ September 16, 2019, 366 l5472; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l5472
- Training surgeons with clickers and warm scrotum studies win Ig Nobel awardsBMJ September 16, 2019, 366 l5574; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l5574
Cited by...
- Effects of physical exercise during pregnancy on mothers and neonates health: a protocol for an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
- Canadian guideline for Parkinson disease
- 2018 update of the EULAR recommendations for the role of the nurse in the management of chronic inflammatory arthritis
- Methodological quality and redundancy of systematic reviews that compare endarterectomy versus stenting for carotid stenosis
- Medication adherence interventions and outcomes: an overview of systematic reviews
- Single or dual antiplatelet therapy after a transient ischaemic attack or minor ischaemic stroke?
- Assessing methodologic quality of a meta-analysis on managing chronic disease in older adults
- The authors respond to "Assessing methodologic quality of a meta-analysis on managing chronic disease in older adults"
- Effectiveness of interventions for reducing TB incidence in countries with low TB incidence: a systematic review of reviews
- Treatment of stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: protocol for a systematic review and evidence map
- Overview of biomedical and public health reviews in Ethiopia from 1970 to 2018: trends, methodological qualities, gaps and future directions
- Neutrophil counts and cancer prognosis: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies
- Synthesising evidence on patient portals: a protocol for an umbrella review
- Wake up and smell the coffee: caffeine supplementation and exercise performance--an umbrella review of 21 published meta-analyses
- Scoping review of systematic reviews of complementary medicine for musculoskeletal and mental health conditions
- Interventions to improve patient flow in emergency departments: an umbrella review
- Elements of integrated care approaches for older people: a review of reviews
- A systematic assessment of Cochrane reviews and systematic reviews published in high-impact medical journals related to cancer