Conference organisers swimming against the tide of Twitter
BMJ 2017; 358 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j3966 (Published 06 September 2017) Cite this as: BMJ 2017;358:j3966- Dara Mohammadi, journalist
- London
- hello{at}daramohammadi.com
In June the American Diabetes Association (ADA) banned attendees at its 77th Scientific Sessions meeting from sharing photographs of presented slides on social media. Using its Twitter account, @AmDiabetesAssn, it personally and publicly asked each offending delegate to delete their tweets.1
This was met with a huge, defiant, and largely humorous reaction, with many tweets comparing the policy with Orwellian censorship. One commentator pointed to the absurdity of not being able to share a photograph from a presentation about “open innovation.”
Such was the force of the delegates’ response that an analysis of the meeting’s hashtag, #ADA2017, by Graham Mackenzie, a consultant in public health medicine at NHS Lothian, showed that the Twitter ban was a more popular topic of online conversation than anything presented at the meeting.2
“I don’t agree with what they did but I have sympathy for the ADA,” Mackenzie told The BMJ about the backlash. “When things start to go awry on Twitter, much like when a political party makes a bad move in an election campaign, it can be very difficult to put it back in the box.”
Intellectual property
The ADA has stood firm. In response to a request for an interview with The BMJ it emailed a statement, also sent to other outlets, saying that the ban was maintained to protect intellectual property which belonged to speakers and not the association.
“Upon registration,” the statement read, “all attendees …
Log in
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Subscribe from £184 *
Subscribe and get access to all BMJ articles, and much more.
* For online subscription
Access this article for 1 day for:
£50 / $60/ €56 (excludes VAT)
You can download a PDF version for your personal record.