Most London hospitals and clinics exceed air pollution limitsBMJ 2017; 357 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j2855 (Published 14 June 2017) Cite this as: BMJ 2017;357:j2855
All rapid responses
Rapid responses are electronic comments to the editor. They enable our users to debate issues raised in articles published on bmj.com. A rapid response is first posted online. If you need the URL (web address) of an individual response, simply click on the response headline and copy the URL from the browser window. A proportion of responses will, after editing, be published online and in the print journal as letters, which are indexed in PubMed. Rapid responses are not indexed in PubMed and they are not journal articles. The BMJ reserves the right to remove responses which are being wilfully misrepresented as published articles or when it is brought to our attention that a response spreads misinformation.
From March 2022, the word limit for rapid responses will be 600 words not including references and author details. We will no longer post responses that exceed this limit.
The word limit for letters selected from posted responses remains 300 words.
I was pleased to see the emphasis on air pollution in a recent BMJ.
As Godlee stated in her Editor's Choice, "the government has devolved most responsibility for delivering its clean air plan to local authorities".
This has long been a problem. Many of the problems of air pollution cannot be solved by local authorities. There may be a pollution blackspot - caused entirely by traffic, over which the local authority has no influence: they have no power over national roads, the location of airports, national policies on the use of different fuel sources, etc.
Quite apart from giving responsibility solely to bodies which have little ability to affect it, this has the secondary effect of ensuring that "instructions" to local authorities cease to be instructions. A significant number of the requirements are placed on local authorities. Daily, they daily have to decide which of their responsibilities they won't attempt to meet (particularly during a period of austerity). One would hope that they will base their decisions on which will do less harm, often when comparing chalk and cheese. Perhaps the decision to use the cheaper cladding for Grenfell Tower was a sensible decision, based on a gamble that a fire wouldn't happen, and the money could be used better elsewhere?
The national government must take overall responsibility for air quality, and be held to account for devolving responsib ility to bodies which are not empowered to make the changes that are necessary if we are to maintain reasonable air quality standards.
Competing interests: No competing interests