David Oliver: From acute ward to care home—a journey fewer should take?BMJ 2017; 357 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j1915 (Published 25 April 2017) Cite this as: BMJ 2017;357:j1915
Some are serially readmitted when it’s too challenging to assess them at home, each crisis damaging our confidence, and theirs, about staying at home. Others have life changing events such as stroke or hip fracture, bringing new disability. Some will transition straight from that acute admission into a new care home placement, waving their former home goodbye.3
It’s pointless being rigidly proscriptive or prescriptive about this unfortunate scenario. It can’t be a “never” event.4 Sometimes it’s the best or only option left, what patients freely choose, the only option now acceptable to exhausted carers, or where careful best interest decisions lead.
Yet we could do more to make this less common. Sixfold geographical variations in new care home placements, including those from acute hospitals, are not accounted for by population need.56 So, what might help, once patients have already made it beyond the hospital front door or community responses?
We need to do all we can to establish reliable, early, proactive rehabilitation and ensure that admission doesn’t make patients more dependent, institutionalised, and harder to get back home—for example, from preventable or undiagnosed delirium, poor nutrition, or functional loss.7
Multidisciplinary, ward based comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) improves patients’ chances of remaining alive and at home months after leaving hospital.89 Ideally, we’d ensure that no decisions or promises were made without this. Giving geriatricians care home forms to complete, when the decision is a fait accompli, helps nobody.
Common causes of new care home admissions include incontinence, falls, immobility and dependence, dementia, and associated behavioural and psychological symptoms.10
Giving geriatricians care home forms to complete, when the decision is a fait accompli, helps nobody
CGA can help identify these problems, reverse the reversible, or develop plans to help people and their carers live better with the irreversible. But, unless we reverse the severe rationing of home care services and continuing care funding, the offer of home support will often still be inadequate.1112
Better access to age-friendly and extra-care housing, adjustments to existing properties, and telecare could also support more people at home for longer.1314 Crucially, we need more capacity in step-down intermediate care or “time to decide” services and beds, to give every chance of less rushed recovery outside acute ward settings.15
Finally, we must resist pressure from full beds or well meaning families to make hasty, pressurised, life changing decisions when people are still recovering. Older citizens have the same right to take risks as the rest of us. We shouldn’t make infantilising and ageist decisions about them without them, however well intentioned.