Solanezumab and the amyloid hypothesis for Alzheimer’s disease
BMJ 2016; 355 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6771 (Published 29 December 2016) Cite this as: BMJ 2016;355:i6771
Chinese translation
该文章的中文翻译
- David G Le Couteur, professor of geriatric medicine1,
- Sally Hunter, research associate2,
- Carol Brayne, professor of public health2
- 1Centre for Education and Research on Ageing, Concord Hospital and University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- 2Cambridge Institute of Public Health, Cambridge, UK
- Correspondence to: D G Le Couteur david.lecouteur{at}sydney.edu.au
Is the amyloid cascade hypothesis of Alzheimer’s disease too big to fail?1 It proposes that brain deposition of β amyloid protein is the critical early event in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease and has been the centrepiece of dementia research for decades.2 The hypothesis suggests that removing β amyloid will reverse or prevent the clinical expression of dementia. However, in all phase III clinical trials to date, treatments targeting β amyloid have failed to improve cognitive outcomes despite reducing brain β amyloid.3
It is widely argued that these negative trials do not disprove the hypothesis but that treatments should be given decades earlier before β amyloid has “caused” neuronal loss, or that the trials had included people without amyloid deposits.2 The results of a third trial investigating solanezumab (EXPEDITION3), a monoclonal antibody targeting amyloid plaques, were therefore eagerly awaited after the first two trials had negative results but with post hoc indications of potential effects on …
Log in
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Subscribe from £173 *
Subscribe and get access to all BMJ articles, and much more.
* For online subscription
Access this article for 1 day for:
£38 / $45 / €42 (excludes VAT)
You can download a PDF version for your personal record.