Rapid responses are electronic comments to the editor. They enable our users to debate issues raised in articles published on bmj.com. A rapid response is first posted online. If you need the URL (web address) of an individual response, simply click on the response headline and copy the URL from the browser window. A proportion of responses will, after editing, be published online and in the print journal as letters, which are indexed in PubMed. Rapid responses are not indexed in PubMed and they are not journal articles. The BMJ reserves the right to remove responses which are being wilfully misrepresented as published articles.
I read with great interest your article on Vote Leave breaking the rules over the NHS logo published on the 15th of October in the BMJ.
Now as a resident of Edgbaston, Birmingham, Gisela Stuart is my MP and I have consistently voted for her over the years as many of the labour principles are in kilter with my own. I was however mildly irritated that she decided to take the 'Leave' side, and now that almost all the Brexiteers have decided that there will be no magical £350 million to spend on the NHS together with the new information gleaned from your article, I find myself feeling strongly against what in retrospect was not just a misleading, but also borderline illegal campaign.
How did the department of health let it slide? Are they feckless or just blind?
I have emailed Gisela Stuart's team voicing my deep concerns and am expecting a response from her soon.
Thank you for enlightening me and giving me some fire to engage with my local (former favourite) politician.