GMC was wrong to release report on GP’s competence to patient, rules judge
BMJ 2016; 354 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i5236 (Published 26 September 2016) Cite this as: BMJ 2016;354:i5236- Clare Dyer
- The BMJ
A High Court judge has ruled that a decision by the UK General Medical Council to release an expert report on a GP’s competence to the patient who complained about him was unlawful.
The patient, who had been given a diagnosis of bladder cancer, complained to the regulator about the GP, named only as DB. He claimed that his illness would have been recognised a year earlier had the doctor been doing his job properly.
The GMC commissioned a report from an expert, who decided that DB had fallen below the expected standard, “but not seriously below.” The expert concluded that most reasonably competent GPs would not have suspected …
Log in
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Subscribe from £173 *
Subscribe and get access to all BMJ articles, and much more.
* For online subscription
Access this article for 1 day for:
£38 / $45 / €42 (excludes VAT)
You can download a PDF version for your personal record.