News Side effects are under-reported in peer reviewed journals BMJ 2016; 354 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i5075 (Published 21 September 2016) Cite this as: BMJ 2016;354:i5075 Article Related content Metrics Responses Peer review Related articles No related articles found. See more UK medical organisations back dedicated sex and gender research policies BMJ December 11, 2023, 383 p2912; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.p2912 How bibliometrics and school rankings reward unreliable science BMJ August 17, 2023, 382 p1887; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.p1887 Unveiling hidden inequalities in diversity and inclusion in medical research BMJ June 13, 2023, 381 p1354; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.p1354 Give doctors financial incentives to take part in clinical trials, review recommends BMJ May 30, 2023, 381 p1226; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.p1226 How pandemic publishing struck a blow to the visibility of women’s expertise BMJ April 06, 2023, 381 p788; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.p788 Cited by... Side effects of acetazolamide: a systematic review and meta-analysis assessing overall risk and dose dependenceAbstract Fulltext PDF
