Wellbeing and being wellBMJ 2016; 354 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i3951 (Published 20 July 2016) Cite this as: BMJ 2016;354:i3951
What does being healthy mean? What it does not mean—according to the well worn World Health Organization definition—is the absence of disease.1 More positively than that, as the WHO definition clarifies, health is a “state of complete physical, mental, and social wellbeing.” This classic definition of what it means to be healthy is great—as far as it goes. But what does wellbeing mean? And—at the risk of getting into a definitional loop—is wellbeing essentially the same as being well?
Traditional, largely economic measures—gross domestic product, unemployment rates, etc—have long been recognised as providing only a partial picture of a nation’s progress or wellbeing. But since 2011 (and following an early commitment by the coalition government in 20102) the Office for National Statistics (ONS) has reported on an annual UK-wide survey covering around 160 000 members of the public designed to elicit views about their wellbeing.3 4 The survey asks about satisfaction with life, the extent to which the things they do in life are worthwhile, and how happy and how anxious they feel (box). It also gathers data on personal characteristics and self assessed ratings of health. Data from these subjective surveys of individual wellbeing are now increasingly combined with more traditional measures to provide an overview of national wellbeing.6
UK national wellbeing survey questions5
Life satisfaction—Overall, how satisfied are you with your life nowadays? Where 0 is “not at all satisfied” and 10 is “completely satisfied”
Worthwhile—Overall, to what extent do you feel the things you do in your life are worthwhile? Where 0 is “not at all worthwhile” and 10 is “completely worthwhile”'
Happiness—Overall, how happy did you feel yesterday? Where 0 is “not at all happy” and 10 is “completely happy”
Anxiety—Overall, how anxious did you feel yesterday? Where 0 is “not at all anxious” and 10 is “completely anxious”
Trends in three wellbeing measures show statistically significant improvements over the five years to 2015-16. However, the latest survey suggests that ratings for life satisfaction and doing things in life that are worthwhile have remained statistically unchanged in 2015-16 compared with 2014-15. Whether the increase between these years is meaningful remains moot (fig 1⇓).
There are also statistically significant differences in levels of wellbeing between population groups. Perhaps surprisingly (though the correlates of happiness are not always straightforward), Northern Ireland recorded the highest happiness levels of the four UK countries in 2015-16 (fig 2⇓). Within England, the East Midlands was significantly happier than the North East. And across age groups, happiness levels reduce for 16-24 year olds to a nadir for 45-54 year olds before rising to a peak for 65-74s and then falling again for older age groups. Again, whether the absolute differences—for example, around 0.2 (on a 0 to 10 scale) at the extremes for regional variations—are meaningful or important is moot.
But what underlies these differences and trends in wellbeing? International comparisons of life satisfaction suggest that people’s health (as they assess it) is positively associated with their ratings of satisfaction with life (fig 3⇓ 7). And as fig 1⇑ shows, trends in wellbeing measures are mirrored by similar trends in the UK’s average self assessed health rating.
These suggestions turn out to be an indication of a more solid relation between wellbeing and being well. A study by the ONS controlling for other factors thought to influence levels of wellbeing shows a definite and significant relation between wellbeing and health.8 As fig 4⇓ shows, relative to those rating their health as “good,” lower ratings on four wellbeing measures are correlated with poorer levels of self-assessed health (the reverse for anxiety). In fact, of the factors tested by the ONS study, self assessed health was the most influential.
It would seem that improving individual, and hence national, wellbeing might best be achieved through improving people’s health. Whether this would be more cost effective than, say, improving people’s earnings (positively correlated with life satisfaction) remains to be seen.
Competing interests: I have read and understood BMJ policy on declaration of interests and have no relevant interests to declare.
Provenance and peer review: Commissioned; externally peer reviewed.