Potato intake and incidence of hypertension: results from three prospective US cohort studies
BMJ 2016; 353 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i2351 (Published 17 May 2016) Cite this as: BMJ 2016;353:i2351
All rapid responses
Rapid responses are electronic comments to the editor. They enable our users to debate issues raised in articles published on bmj.com. A rapid response is first posted online. If you need the URL (web address) of an individual response, simply click on the response headline and copy the URL from the browser window. A proportion of responses will, after editing, be published online and in the print journal as letters, which are indexed in PubMed. Rapid responses are not indexed in PubMed and they are not journal articles. The BMJ reserves the right to remove responses which are being wilfully misrepresented as published articles or when it is brought to our attention that a response spreads misinformation.
From March 2022, the word limit for rapid responses will be 600 words not including references and author details. We will no longer post responses that exceed this limit.
The word limit for letters selected from posted responses remains 300 words.
In their recent report, Borgi and colleagues concluded that; ‘Higher intakes of boiled, baked, or mashed potatoes, and French fries were associated with an increased risk of hypertension in adult women and men.’[1] This conclusion was based on analyses of three cohort samples; two groups of women; the Nurses’ Health Study (NHS), the Nurses’ Health Study II (NHS II) and men in the Health Professionals Follow-up study (HPFS) from 1986 to 2010.
Cohort research designs can be effective for investigating the long-term health effects of nutritional patterns. One limitation of cohort studies is the risk of confounding. To reduce this possibility statistical analyses typically adjust for potential confounders.
The reported hazard ratios were adjusted for multiple covariates including; age, race/ethnicity, BMI, smoking status, physical activity, weight change, frequency questionnaire cycle, alcohol intake, family history of hypertension, total energy intake, animal flesh intake (combination of processed and unprocessed red meat, poultry, and seafood), whole grains, sugar sweetened drink intake, artificially sweetened diet drink intake, total fruit, total vegetables (see complete list in original paper). The multivariate adjusted hazard ratios for hypertension are shown in Table 1. Although the increased risk of hypertension associated with consumption of French Fries was consistent across all three samples, the consumption of baked boiled or mashed potatoes was only associated with hypertension in the two NHS samples of women. The association of potato chips with hypertension showed small and inconsistent trends across the three samples.
The inconsistent findings between the samples of men and women, indicates potential problems with the conclusions. A major limitation of the analyses was the lack of adjustment for known dietary patterns. Previous research using factor analysis with two of the three samples reported two general dietary patterns; a ‘prudent’ pattern based on high intakes of vegetables, fruit, whole grains fish and poultry; and a ‘western’ pattern based on refined grains, red and processed meat, French fries and sweets and desserts.[2 ,3]. The factors loadings for the ‘Western’ pattern are shown in Table 2. In both the women’s and men’s samples the ‘western’ pattern was associated with a significantly increased risk of coronary heart disease, for which hypertension is a contributing risk factor.
The data in Table 2 indicate that potatoes and French fries are a central component (loadings ≥0.40) of the western diet for women (NHS samples), but only French Fries for men (HPFS sample). Two known risk factors for hypertension (desserts and sweets,[4] and processed meats[5]) were not adjusted in the reported hazard ratios. Two covariates included in the adjustment were ‘sugar sweetened drinks’ and ‘animal flesh.’ These covariates would not remove confounding from the central components of the western dietary pattern shown in Table 2. A more plausible explanation for the hazard ratios reported is that the western dietary pattern is a risk factor for hypertension, not necessarily potatoes per se. The lack of relationship reported between mashed, boiled or baked potatoes and hypertension in the HPFS sample is consistent with the less central contribution of potatoes to the western diet in the male sample. In contrast, French fries were a core component of the western diet in both the male and female samples, consistent with the Hazard ratios shown in Table 1.
In summary, the hazard ratios reported in Table 1 did not adjust for the confounding of potato intake with core components of the western dietary pattern which are known high risk foods for hypertension. An alternative conclusion is consumption of up to one serving of baked boiled or mashed potatoes per day is unlikely to be a risk factor for hypertension. In contrast to the authors’ view, because of ‘residual confounding’ the study did not provide sufficient evidence to remove potatoes from food assistance programmes.
As has been noted previously, analyses focusing on individual foods in cohort research should take into account the association of those foods with dietary patterns to establish whether the effect of a specific food is independent from its association with dietary patterns.[6] The use of factor analysis is an effective method for establishing patterns among food measures.
References
1. Borgi L, Rimm EB, Willett WC, et al. Potato intake and incidence of hypertension: results from three prospective US cohort studies. BMJ 2016;353:i2351 doi:10.1136/bmj.i2351
2. Fung TT, Willett WC, Stampfer MJ, et al. Dietary patterns and the risk of coronary heart disease in women. Arch Intern Med 2001;161(15):1857-62 doi:10.1001/archinte.161.15.1857
3. Hu FB, Rimm EB, Stampfer MJ, et al. Prospective study of major dietary patterns and risk of coronary heart disease in men. Am J Clin Nutr 2000;72(4):912-21
4. Jalal DI, Smits G, Johnson RJ, et al. Increased Fructose Associates with Elevated Blood Pressure. J Am Soc Nephrol 2010;21(9):1543-49 doi:10.1681/asn.2009111111
5. Micha R, Wallace SK, Mozaffarian D. Red and Processed Meat Consumption and Risk of Incident Coronary Heart Disease, Stroke, and Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Circulation 2010;121(21):2271-83 doi:10.1161/circulationaha.109.924977
6. Hu FB. Dietary pattern analysis: a new direction in nutritional epidemiology. Curr Opin Lipidol 2002;13(1):3-9
Competing interests: No competing interests
Dear Editor,
We read with great interest the study of “Potato intake and incidence of hypertension: results from three prospective US cohort studies” by Borgi et al. [1] published in the BMJ. Despite high quality methodology and large sample size, taking into account certain statistical limitation in the paper, multivariate modeling of nonlinear dose-response through categorization of the exposure variable or entering quadratic dummy variables in the model may lead to bias in the interpretation of the results [2]. One of the best alternative statistical methods is restricted cubic spline regression which is available in many statistical packages [3]. Borgi et al. used classic meta-analysis method to pool the adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) without considering potential bias due to non-linear dose response relationship between different types of potato serving and hypertension.
Considering the potential for a non-linear dose response, we reanalyzed and used the Greenland and Longnecke method of dose-response meta-analysis with unit of dose serving per week. The non-linearity of dose response was modeled using restricted cubic spline with three knots at the 25th, 50th, and 75th percentiles of potato consumption. The model demonstrated the non-linearity of the dose-response relationship for all models (P-value of non-linearity < 0.001) (Figure 1). Our non-significant finding while generally support the same finding as the authors did for potato chips and “baked, boiled, or mashed” potato, however, we showed that the “baked, boiled, or mashed potatoes and French fries” (BBMFF) have a highly significant curvilinear dose-response relationship with hypertension (Figure 1). The non-linearity of dose response may weaken the conclusion made by the authors and deserves serious attention.
References
1. Borgi L, Rimm EB, Willett WC, et al. Potato intake and incidence of hypertension: results from three prospective US cohort studies. BMJ (Clinical research ed) 2016;353:i2351 doi: 10.1136/bmj.i2351[published Online First: Epub Date]|.
2. Royston P, Altman DG, Sauerbrei W. Dichotomizing continuous predictors in multiple regression: a bad idea. Statistics in medicine 2006;25(1):127-41 doi: 10.1002/sim.2331[published Online First: Epub Date]|.
3. Orsini N, Greenland S. A procedure to tabulate and plot results after flexible modeling of a quantitative covariate. Stata Journal 2011;11(1):1-29
Figure 1. Non-linear dose-response analyses of different type of potato consumption and risk of hypertension in meta-analysis (P-value of non-linearity for all the four panel were < 0.001). HR: hazard ration; CI: 95% confidence interval
Competing interests: No competing interests
There are conflicting reports about the benefits and harmful effects on health due to the intake of boiled potatoes. Therefore one needs to be careful in generalizing facts about the nutritional benefits or harms caused by the intake of potatoes. One cannot say or equate taking boiled potatoes to taking French fries, which have a high salt content.(210mg/100gm).
I think one needs to provide judicious but scientific advice regarding the intake of nutrients before finding a cause and effect.
Boiled in its skin, a large potato, weighing about 300 grams, has 261 calories, 5.6 grams of protein and 0.3 grams of fat. If you peel the potato before boiling it, you lose about a half gram of protein, but the calorie and fat contents remain similar. Peeled or unpeeled, the potato has 5.4 grams of fiber, about the same amount as a bowl of bran flakes cereal, and 2.6 grams of natural sugar. Boiled potatoes are naturally rich in vitamins and minerals, particularly potassium, phosphorus, B-complex vitamins and vitamin C. They are low in calories and fat, and their high fiber content helps you feel full. Contrary to popular belief, potatoes are not inherently fattening.
According to a study in the British Journal of Nutrition, potatoes are wrongly classified as high on the Glycemic Index, which ranks carbohydrates from one to 100 according to how quickly they are broken down during digestion into basic glucose. Pure glucose scores 100. The lower the rank, the longer it takes for the food to be absorbed, and the longer we feel satiated after eating it.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-1206765/Why-potatoes-suprising...
Kindly provide true scientific facts to the common man who indulges in taking potatoes in various forms.
Competing interests: No competing interests
Food allergies and hypertension.
Several factors, which also cause oxidative stress, could contribute to hypertensive reactions to specific foods. Potatoes are from the same food family as tobacco.1
Stopping smoking, ergot medications and use of oral contraceptives resulted in a 10 times reduction in migraine attacks.2 Also 60 migraine patients completed elimination diets after a 5-day period of withdrawal from their normal diet. 52 (87%) of these patients had been using oral contraceptive steroids, tobacco, and/or ergotamine for an average of 3 years, 22 years, and 7.4 years respectively. The commonest foods causing reactions were wheat (78%), orange (65%), eggs (45%), tea and coffee (40% each), chocolate and milk (37%) each), beef (35%), and corn, cane sugar, and yeast (33% each). When an average of ten common foods were avoided there was a dramatic fall in the number of headaches per month, 85% of patients becoming headache-free. The 25% of patients with hypertension became normotensive.3 www.harmfromhormones.co.uk
Cooking potatoes as French fries in corn oil may be contributing to any potato-induced hypertension.
1 Borgi L, Rimm E, Willett WC, Forman JP. Potato intake and incidence of hypertension: results from three prospective US cohort studies. BMJ 2016;353:i2351.
2 Grant EC. Oral contraceptives, smoking, migraine and food allergies. Lancet 1978;2:581-82.
3 Grant E C. Food allergies and migraine. Lancet 1979,1,966-69.
Competing interests: No competing interests
In 1885 when he still was living in Nuenen, Netherlands Vincent van Gogh completed a famous painting called the Potato Eaters (Dutch: De Aardappeleters). When looking at these hungry peasants one doesn’t get the impression that high blood pressure was particularly rampant among them. Conceivably when regular caloric intake borders on starvation, the high glycemic load of potato intake may have little or no pro-hypertensive effect.
Conversely when such a high glycemic load is superimposed on a concealed insulin resistant metabolism as is increasingly common in today’s peasants and city dwellers alike, it may well , as the authors postulate (1), trigger excessive postprandial hyperglycemia associated with endothelial dysfunction, oxidative stress, and inflammation, all of which are potentially pathogenic mechanisms of hypertension.
1.Borgi L, Rimm E, Willett WC, Forman JP. Potato intake and incidence of hypertension: results from three prospective US cohort studies. BMJ 2016;353:i2351.
Figure Legend: Vincent van Gogh, Potato Eaters (Dutch: De Aardappeleters) 1885, Vincent van Gogh Museum, Amsterdam
Competing interests: No competing interests
Re: Potato intake and incidence of hypertension: results from three prospective US cohort studies
In Reply- We agree with Dr. Thomas that dietary patterns, rather than individual foods have been associated with cardiovascular disease. However, we also believe that investigations of specific foods with the risk of diseases, such as hypertension, are of substantial value in establishing a dietary pattern. The 2015 Dietary Guidelines’ definition of a healthy eating pattern includes “a variety of vegetables from all of the subgroups—dark green, red and orange, legumes (beans and peas), starchy, and other” [1]. While there is no restriction on potatoes in the 2015 Dietary Guidelines or in school lunches, we feel that studying potato intake with the incidence of hypertension and other diseases has potential public health and policy ramifications.
Because our primary exposure was a specific food, we controlled for other foods, including those that make up prudent and western patterns of dietary intake. The reported hazard ratios were adjusted for animal flesh, which included processed meat, a known hypertension risk factor as mentioned by Dr. Thomas. The inconsistent findings between men and women were unexpected and we believe that replicating our results in other cohorts is important.
1- Millen BE, Abrams S, Adams-Campbell L, et al. The 2015 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee Scientific Report: Development and Major Conclusions. Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md) 2016;7:438-44
Competing interests: No competing interests