Rapid responses are electronic comments to the editor. They enable our users to debate issues raised in articles published on bmj.com. A rapid response is first posted online. If you need the URL (web address) of an individual response, simply click on the response headline and copy the URL from the browser window. A proportion of responses will, after editing, be published online and in the print journal as letters, which are indexed in PubMed. Rapid responses are not indexed in PubMed and they are not journal articles. The BMJ reserves the right to remove responses which are being wilfully misrepresented as published articles.
I read and reread the article as published in the hard copy of the BMJ . It may be that there may be some points were lost in the translation from the detailed original article which I have not read. (There is no Fig.5 in the BMJ referred to twice).
1. The article bases the alcohol consumption on the HMRC Duty and tax receipts so the study assumes that there have been no changes in coding/classifications in the tax receipts over the period of the study which might affect the data.
2. The article does state that in the '90s, the economy boomed, which led to an increase in alcohol consumption. As stated, it can take 10 years of drinking to develop liver cirrhosis - would that not account for the peak in 2008 of alcohol related deaths particularly liver disease. Fig 2 - there is also a peak in 2002 consumption correlating with 2012 deaths.
3. Based on Fig 2 , the deaths from Acute Alcohol poisoning have remained fairly constant which is what I would have expected to decrease suddenly in 2008, if there was a direct link to the 2% above inflation escalator.
4. Looking at Fig 1 and Fig 2, I would expect there is going to be another peak in alcohol - related liver deaths around 2018.
5. The article states that the" threshold /minimum pricing is a fiscal policy ", then " "European Court of Justice ruled in favour of a minimum pricing provided that the Scottish government can show it is more effective than fiscal alternatives". If the min pricing is a fiscal policy what are the fiscal alternatives?
I read this as a non specialist /having been out of clinical medicine for 20 years and only in the hardcopy BMJ format and found it fascinating. I would be grateful for any feedback.
In their discussion of alcohol policy and economics, Sheron and Gilmore refer to "The modelling of alcohol policy by the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), World Health Organization, and the UK government". The references given show that the latter refers to the work of the Sheffield Alcohol Research Group (SARG). The researchers who make up SARG would like to make it clear that we are an independent research group based within the University of Sheffield and not a part of the UK government. Our research modelling the impacts of alcohol policies has been funded by a range of organisations including the UK government, the Medical and Economic & Social Research Councils, the National Institute for Health Research and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence.
Re: Effect of policy, economics, and the changing alcohol marketplace on alcohol related deaths in England and Wales
I read and reread the article as published in the hard copy of the BMJ . It may be that there may be some points were lost in the translation from the detailed original article which I have not read. (There is no Fig.5 in the BMJ referred to twice).
1. The article bases the alcohol consumption on the HMRC Duty and tax receipts so the study assumes that there have been no changes in coding/classifications in the tax receipts over the period of the study which might affect the data.
2. The article does state that in the '90s, the economy boomed, which led to an increase in alcohol consumption. As stated, it can take 10 years of drinking to develop liver cirrhosis - would that not account for the peak in 2008 of alcohol related deaths particularly liver disease. Fig 2 - there is also a peak in 2002 consumption correlating with 2012 deaths.
3. Based on Fig 2 , the deaths from Acute Alcohol poisoning have remained fairly constant which is what I would have expected to decrease suddenly in 2008, if there was a direct link to the 2% above inflation escalator.
4. Looking at Fig 1 and Fig 2, I would expect there is going to be another peak in alcohol - related liver deaths around 2018.
5. The article states that the" threshold /minimum pricing is a fiscal policy ", then " "European Court of Justice ruled in favour of a minimum pricing provided that the Scottish government can show it is more effective than fiscal alternatives". If the min pricing is a fiscal policy what are the fiscal alternatives?
I read this as a non specialist /having been out of clinical medicine for 20 years and only in the hardcopy BMJ format and found it fascinating. I would be grateful for any feedback.
Competing interests: No competing interests