Corrections An open letter to The BMJ editors on qualitative research BMJ 2016; 352 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i957 (Published 16 February 2016) Cite this as: BMJ 2016;352:i957 Article Related content Metrics Responses Peer review Related articles Analysis An open letter to The BMJ editors on qualitative research Published: 10 February 2016; BMJ 352 doi:10.1136/bmj.i563 See more Covid-19 trials: allow recruitment by everyone in healthcare, including those not previously involved in research BMJ March 02, 2021, 372 n599; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n599 Fabricated illness: guidance is updated as survey shows nearly all paediatricians see potential cases BMJ March 02, 2021, 372 n610; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n610 Covid-19: Where are we on vaccines and variants? BMJ March 02, 2021, 372 n597; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n597 Covid-19: Single dose of Pfizer and Oxford vaccines cuts risk of hospital admission by 80% in over 80s, data suggest BMJ March 02, 2021, 372 n612; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n612 Children’s mental health: the UK government needs to be far more ambitious BMJ March 02, 2021, 372 n573; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n573
