Letters Evidence for timing of childhood vaccines debate The question should be whether the timing of vaccination optimises the impact on child health BMJ 2016; 352 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i1713 (Published 31 March 2016) Cite this as: BMJ 2016;352:i1713 Article Related content Metrics Responses Peer review Related articles Research Non-specific effects of standard measles vaccine at 4.5 and 9 months of age on childhood mortality: randomised controlled trial Published: 30 November 2010; BMJ 341 doi:10.1136/bmj.c6495 Head To Head Is the timing of recommended childhood vaccines evidence based? Published: 23 February 2016; BMJ 352 doi:10.1136/bmj.i867 See more Dengue: Argentinians turn to homemade repellent amid surge in cases BMJ April 17, 2024, 385 q885; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.q885 Devolved powers for Greater Manchester led to some health improvements, study shows BMJ March 28, 2024, 384 q767; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.q767 Long waits in child mental health are a “ticking time bomb” regulator warns BMJ March 22, 2024, 384 q724; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.q724 Doctors report big rise in patients with illness because of socioeconomic factors BMJ March 01, 2024, 384 q538; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.q538 Diphtheria: WHO publishes first ever guidance following outbreaks BMJ February 14, 2024, 384 q407; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.q407
