Bombing Syria without protecting civilians won’t counter extremism or reduce refugees
BMJ 2015; 351 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h6803 (Published 15 December 2015) Cite this as: BMJ 2015;351:h6803- Ayman S Jundi, consultant in emergency medicine, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust; president, Syrian British Medical Society
- a.jundi{at}sb-ms.org
While you are reading this, British Royal Air Force bombers may be carrying out air strikes against targets in Syria. Civilians may well be affected. RAF bombers started their campaign within hours of a parliamentary vote authorising the extension of air strikes to Syria. But limited strikes against so called Islamic State (ISIS, ISIL, Daesh) are not a sustainable long term solution, and they do not tackle the root causes of extremism or the refugee crisis.
In fact, if anything, they are likely to make these two problems even worse. The US led coalition has been bombing ISIS targets in Iraq and Syria for more than a year, with limited …
Log in
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Subscribe from £173 *
Subscribe and get access to all BMJ articles, and much more.
* For online subscription
Access this article for 1 day for:
£30 / $37 / €33 (excludes VAT)
You can download a PDF version for your personal record.