Use of positive and negative words in scientific PubMed abstracts between 1974 and 2014: retrospective analysis

Research Christmas 2015: The Publication Game

BMJ 2015; 351 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h6467 (Published 14 December 2015) Cite this as: BMJ 2015;351:h6467

Data supplement

A Habitat Selection Multiverse Reveals Largely Consistent Results Despite a Multitude of Analysis Options
- Abstract
- Fulltext
- PDF
Randomized clinical trial quality has improved over time but is still not good enough: an analysis of 176,620 randomized controlled trials published between 1966 and 2018
- Abstract
- Fulltext
- PDF
Gender differences in how scientists present the importance of their research: observational study
- Abstract
- Fulltext
- PDF
When is a fish stock collapsed?
- Abstract
- Fulltext
- PDF
The readability of scientific texts is decreasing over time
- Abstract
- Fulltext
- PDF
Sackler Colloquium on Improving the Reproducibility of Scientific Research: Misrepresentation and distortion of research in biomedical literature
- Abstract
- Fulltext
- PDF
Influence of overstated abstract conclusions on clinicians: a web-based randomised controlled trial
- Abstract
- Fulltext
- PDF
Perspective: Improving Nutritional Guidelines for Sustainable Health Policies: Current Status and Perspectives
- Abstract
- Fulltext
- PDF
Confronting stem cell hype
- Abstract
- Fulltext
- PDF