Rapid responses are electronic comments to the editor. They enable our users
to debate issues raised in articles published on bmj.com. A rapid response
is first posted online. If you need the URL (web address) of an individual
response, simply click on the response headline and copy the URL from the
browser window. A proportion of responses will, after editing, be published
online and in the print journal as letters, which are indexed in PubMed.
Rapid responses are not indexed in PubMed and they are not journal articles.
The BMJ reserves the right to remove responses which are being
wilfully misrepresented as published articles or when it is brought to our
attention that a response spreads misinformation.
From March 2022, the word limit for rapid responses will be 600 words not
including references and author details. We will no longer post responses
that exceed this limit.
The word limit for letters selected from posted responses remains 300 words.
I read with great interest the article by Dr Chinthapalli. He raises awareness of the increasing use of cognitive enhancing medications and the use and abuse of these drugs in academia.
The use of these medications I feel is somewhat a double edge sword. The use of these medications to enhance cognitive ability may well help persons' realises the extent of their academic potential. However, in the article the use of these agents do seem to elude to the unfair advantage one student may exploit over their peers and as a result equate to "cheating".
This situation may well mirror the issue we are seeing in both college and professional athletics where performance enhancing drugs seem to be tarnishing a sport whose founding principle which is similar to academia is based solely on human endeavour, perseverance and basic talent.
I feel academic institutes must take measures to ensure that pupils are on a level playing field when undertaking their respective courses and exams. This must be appropriately policed and those found to have used these medications unfairly are subjected to the appropriate academic reprimands. Furthermore, the uses of these agents on developing minds and the long term implications of their use is still to be researched and could lead to long term cognitive issues in the future. Such as those experienced by the protagonist in the movie Limitless.
Competing interests:
No competing interests
19 September 2015
Nikul H Ajwani
Student
Runshaw College
Langdale Road, Leyland, Lancashire, United Kingdom PR25 3DQ
The students perspective on cognitive enhancing drugs
Dear Sir
I read with great interest the article by Dr Chinthapalli. He raises awareness of the increasing use of cognitive enhancing medications and the use and abuse of these drugs in academia.
The use of these medications I feel is somewhat a double edge sword. The use of these medications to enhance cognitive ability may well help persons' realises the extent of their academic potential. However, in the article the use of these agents do seem to elude to the unfair advantage one student may exploit over their peers and as a result equate to "cheating".
This situation may well mirror the issue we are seeing in both college and professional athletics where performance enhancing drugs seem to be tarnishing a sport whose founding principle which is similar to academia is based solely on human endeavour, perseverance and basic talent.
I feel academic institutes must take measures to ensure that pupils are on a level playing field when undertaking their respective courses and exams. This must be appropriately policed and those found to have used these medications unfairly are subjected to the appropriate academic reprimands. Furthermore, the uses of these agents on developing minds and the long term implications of their use is still to be researched and could lead to long term cognitive issues in the future. Such as those experienced by the protagonist in the movie Limitless.
Competing interests: No competing interests