Re: Restoring Study 329: efficacy and harms of paroxetine and imipramine in treatment of major depression in adolescence
Why is there no peer review history for this article? Given that this is a re-analysis of a previously published study, which, presumably the original authors still stand by, it would be especially interesting to see what the peer reviewers had to say about this new analysis and interpretation.
Rapid Response:
Re: Restoring Study 329: efficacy and harms of paroxetine and imipramine in treatment of major depression in adolescence
Why is there no peer review history for this article? Given that this is a re-analysis of a previously published study, which, presumably the original authors still stand by, it would be especially interesting to see what the peer reviewers had to say about this new analysis and interpretation.
Competing interests: No competing interests