Intended for healthcare professionals

Feature Data Briefing

Day case surgery: a good news story for the NHS

BMJ 2015; 351 doi: (Published 29 July 2015) Cite this as: BMJ 2015;351:h4060
  1. John Appleby, chief economist, King’s Fund, London, UK
  1. j.appleby{at}

The rising proportion of operations carried out as day cases over the past few decades has been good for patients and a much more efficient use of NHS resources, says John Appleby

Over the past 40 years there has been a revolution in surgery. A combination of new surgical techniques, advances in anaesthesia, the collection and publication of comparative data, and deliberate policy—including financial incentives for hospitals—has led to a large switch to day case surgery.

It is a quarter of a century since the Audit Commission published its first NHS value for money report. The 1990 review identified several interventions, including cataract surgery and laparoscopic cholecystectomy, that clinical opinion suggested could be carried out as day cases in greater numbers.

The commission’s analysis suggested that if all health authorities in England and Wales, “performed day surgery consistently at readily achievable levels for each of 20 common procedures, an additional 186 000 patients could be treated each year without increased expenditure.”1

Following the review, the Department of Health set up a task force on day surgery along with £15m (€21m; $23m) of capital funds to expand the number of dedicated day surgery units. By 2001, almost all trusts had at least one unit.

But the 2001 follow-up review by the Audit Commission pushed for further progress: “If all trusts could achieve the levels of the best performers (the upper quartile of the distribution of the percentage of day cases), 120 000 existing inpatients in England and Wales could be treated as day cases to the benefit of all concerned.”2

Figure 1 shows trends in England from 1974 to 2013 in the proportion of all elective and non-elective procedures that were carried out as day cases each year.3 4 From a low of around 7% in 1974, this proportion increased to nearly 35% by 2013—an increase in cases from around 417 000 to 6.3 million a year. In fact, a more appropriate comparison would be for elective procedures only. However, earlier data collections did not separately identify non-elective activity. More recent data from 1998 onwards suggests day cases as a proportion of elective activity have increased from 67% to 78% in 2013.5


Fig 1 Proportion of all patient activity during the year carried out as day cases: England: 1974-20133 4

As day case patients cost less to treat than patients who stay overnight as inpatients (in 2013-14, the average day case cost was £698 and the average elective inpatient case £3375,5 the increasing proportion of day case activity has helped reduce overall costs.

Imagine if the switch to day cases had not changed. Based on national reference costs reported by English hospitals,5 the total cost of treating the total 6.96 million elective day and inpatients in 2013 was around £8.9bn. To treat this number of patients, but with the proportion of day cases as observed in 1998 would cost nearly £11bn (over 22% more). By treating more patients as day cases, the NHS had in effect saved around £2bn by 2013 (fig 2).


Fig 2 Spending on elective inpatients and day case patients in England, 1998-2014: actual v estimated amount if day case activity remained at 1998 levels5

This is likely to be an overestimate, however, as it is based on the average costs of day cases and elective inpatients. In reality patients switched from inpatient care to day cases are likely to have been those with less complicated conditions, who would have had shorter stays and been less costly to treat.

Even though day cases now account for nearly 80% of all elective procedures each year,5 it is likely that there is still scope for further increases. For example, the proportion of day case surgery still varies across England even for procedures for which there is clinical agreement about the use of day surgery, such as haemorrhoidectomy and bladder tumours.6

Assuming the proportion of day cases continues to increase at the same rate for the next decade as it has done in the 15 years since 1998, then, all other things being equal, the total spent on elective care in 2013 would pay for 22% more patient episodes in 2023 (fig 3).


Fig 3 Estimate of number of extra elective patients who could be treated in 2023-24 compared with 2013-14 by gradually increasing the proportion of day case activity to 87% (with no real increase in total spending)


Cite this as: BMJ 2015;351:h4060


  • Competing interests: I have read and understood BMJ policy on declaration of interests and have no relevant interests to declare.

  • Provenance and peer review: Commissioned; externally peer reviewed.


View Abstract

Log in

Log in through your institution


* For online subscription