Head To Head Patient commentary: Direct access would beat receiving test results with the receptionist’s interpretation BMJ 2015; 350 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h797 (Published 11 February 2015) Cite this as: BMJ 2015;350:h797 Article Related content Metrics Responses Peer review Related articles Head To Head Can patients use test results effectively if they have direct access? Published: 11 February 2015; BMJ 350 doi:10.1136/bmj.h673 Head to headCan patients use test results effectively if they have direct access? See more Doctors in Pakistan call for workers deported from the UAE to be screened for HIV BMJ December 05, 2016, 355 i6544; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6544 Time for guidelines on safety netting? BMJ December 05, 2016, 355 i6411; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6411 The BMJ Christmas appeal 2016-7: Orbis, the sight savers BMJ December 01, 2016, 355 i6425; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6425 Association between screening and the thyroid cancer “epidemic” in South Korea: evidence from a nationwide study BMJ November 30, 2016, 355 i5745; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i5745 Overdiagnosis of thyroid cancer BMJ November 30, 2016, 355 i6312; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6312
