Rapid responses are electronic comments to the editor. They enable our users to debate issues raised in articles published on bmj.com. A rapid response is first posted online. If you need the URL (web address) of an individual response, simply click on the response headline and copy the URL from the browser window. A proportion of responses will, after editing, be published online and in the print journal as letters, which are indexed in PubMed. Rapid responses are not indexed in PubMed and they are not journal articles. The BMJ reserves the right to remove responses which are being wilfully misrepresented as published articles.
Anguish over the best management of Ebola patients is a normal human reaction from healthcare personnel distressed over patients dying. If that drives learning to do better next time it should be welcomed as constructive.
One of the main concerns is whether to use oral or IV rehydration. My experience of working with a different disease, cholera, in Bangladesh is that both have a place. Oral rehydration has a low side effect profile and can be very effective if the technique used is appropriate for the patient. Severely dehydrated and lethargic patients cannot drink easily from a cup but can and do suck large amounts from a damp cloth or sponge placed between their lips. This can be done with the patient lying down with one end of the cloth in the patient's mouth and the other in a suitable reservoir of oral rehydration fluid. This technique can be instituted promptly by staff with limited training and minimal resources.
If the patients' state of hydration does not improve IV rehydration remains an option.