Intended for healthcare professionals

CCBYNC Open access

Cerebral near infrared spectroscopy oximetry in extremely preterm infants: phase II randomised clinical trial

BMJ 2015; 350 doi: (Published 05 January 2015) Cite this as: BMJ 2015;350:g7635
  1. Simon Hyttel-Sorensen, research fellow1,
  2. Adelina Pellicer, associate professor2,
  3. Thomas Alderliesten, research fellow3,
  4. Topun Austin, consultant neonatologist4,
  5. Frank van Bel, professor of Neonatology3,
  6. Manon Benders, consultant neonatologist35,
  7. Olivier Claris, professor6,
  8. Eugene Dempsey, professor7,
  9. Axel R Franz, associate professor8,
  10. Monica Fumagalli, consultant neonatologist9,
  11. Christian Gluud, head of department10,
  12. Berit Grevstad, trial manager11,
  13. Cornelia Hagmann, consultant neonatologist12,
  14. Petra Lemmers, consultant neonatologist3,
  15. Wim van Oeveren, managing director13,
  16. Gerhard Pichler, associate professor14,
  17. Anne Mette Plomgaard, research fellow1,
  18. Joan Riera, biomedical engineer215,
  19. Laura Sanchez, consultant neonatologist2,
  20. Per Winkel, senior researcher10,
  21. Martin Wolf, professor16,
  22. Gorm Greisen, professor1
  1. 1Department of Neonatology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Blegdamsvej 9, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
  2. 2Department of Neonatology, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
  3. 3University Medical Center Utrecht, Wilhelmina Children’s Hospital, Utrecht, Netherlands
  4. 4Rosie Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
  5. 5Centre of the Developing Brain, King’s College London, London, UK
  6. 6Department of Neonatology, Hopital Femme Mere Enfants, Bron, France
  7. 7Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, University College Cork, Cork, Republic of Ireland
  8. 8Department of Neonatology, University Children’s Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
  9. 9NICU, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
  10. 10Copenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
  11. 11Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
  12. 12Division of Neonatology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
  13. 13Haemoscan, Groningen, Netherlands
  14. 14Department of Pediatrics, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
  15. 15Center for Biomedical Technology, Technical University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain
  16. 16Biomedical Optics Research Laboratory, Division of Neonatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
  1. Correspondence to: S Hyttel-Sorensen
  • Accepted 21 November 2014


Objective To determine if it is possible to stabilise the cerebral oxygenation of extremely preterm infants monitored by cerebral near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) oximetry.

Design Phase II randomised, single blinded, parallel clinical trial.

Setting Eight tertiary neonatal intensive care units in eight European countries.

Participants 166 extremely preterm infants born before 28 weeks of gestation: 86 were randomised to cerebral NIRS monitoring and 80 to blinded NIRS monitoring. The only exclusion criterion was a decision not to provide life support.

Interventions Monitoring of cerebral oxygenation using NIRS in combination with a dedicated treatment guideline during the first 72 hours of life (experimental) compared with blinded NIRS oxygenation monitoring with standard care (control).

Main outcome measures The primary outcome measure was the time spent outside the target range of 55-85% for cerebral oxygenation multiplied by the mean absolute deviation, expressed in %hours (burden of hypoxia and hyperoxia). One hour with an oxygenation of 50% gives 5%hours of hypoxia. Secondary outcomes were all cause mortality at term equivalent age and a brain injury score assessed by cerebral ultrasonography.

Randomisation Allocation sequence 1:1 with block sizes 4 and 6 in random order concealed for the investigators. The allocation was stratified for gestational age (<26 weeks or ≥26 weeks).

Blinding Cerebral oxygenation measurements were blinded in the control group. All outcome assessors were blinded to group allocation.

Results The 86 infants randomised to the NIRS group had a median burden of hypoxia and hyperoxia of 36.1%hours (interquartile range 9.2-79.5%hours) compared with 81.3 (38.5-181.3) %hours in the control group, a reduction of 58% (95% confidence interval 35% to 73%, P<0.001). In the experimental group the median burden of hypoxia was 16.6 (interquartile range 5.4-68.1) %hours, compared with 53.6 (17.4-171.3) %hours in the control group (P=0.0012). The median burden of hyperoxia was similar between the groups: 1.2 (interquartile range 0.3-9.6) %hours in the experimental group compared with 1.1 (0.1-23.4) %hours in the control group (P=0.98). We found no statistically significant differences between the two groups at term corrected age. No severe adverse reactions were associated with the device.

Conclusions Cerebral oxygenation was stabilised in extremely preterm infants using a dedicated treatment guideline in combination with cerebral NIRS monitoring.

Trial registration NCT01590316.


About 25 000 infants are born extremely preterm every year in Europe. Mortality of such infants is up to 20%, and about 25% of survivors will have cerebral palsy or cognitive impairment.1 2 3 The first hours and days of a preterm infant’s life carry the greatest risks of cerebral hypoxia and hyperoxia, because the transition of the respiratory and circulatory systems just after birth is associated with haemodynamic instability.4 Low systemic blood flow and fluctuations in systemic blood flow during these first days of life are associated with poor neurodevelopmental outcomes.5 6 To reduce the risk of impaired neurodevelopment, effective preventive measures are needed.

Near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) oximetry enables non-invasive estimation of regional tissue haemoglobin oxygen saturation (rStO2) because the ratio of the concentrations of oxygenated haemoglobin to total haemoglobin in the penetrated tissue are in the range of 0% to 100%.7 The NIRS sensor is placed over the organ of interest; the rStO2 reflects primarily the venous saturation of the blood in a volume of tissue to a depth of about 2 cm.8 NIRS offers a direct, continuous measure of the oxygen balance of the organ. rStO2 of the brain has been shown to correlate with cerebral blood flow in adults and in infants born at term.9 10 The thin skull of preterm infants makes cerebral NIRS measurements well suited for this population. Data on the association of cerebral rStO2 and long term outcomes are limited in preterm infants. One study found low cerebral rStO2 associated with lower developmental score at 2 years of age in infants born very preterm.11 Two other studies found that a low cerebral rStO2 on the first day of life was associated with higher grade germinal matrix-intraventricular haemorrhage.12 13 In a piglet model it was shown that a low cerebral rStO2 must be maintained some time before manifest brain damage occurs.14 15 Furthermore, preclinical data suggest that hyperoxia damages the immature brain.16 17 These results indicate that both hypoxia and hyperoxia of the brain should be avoided, if possible.

The Safeguarding the Brains of our smallest Children ( project aims at testing the benefits and harms of cerebral NIRS in the first days of life in extremely preterm infants. Cerebral rStO2 monitoring and a dedicated treatment guideline18 are the cornerstones of a brain oriented protection strategy, with the goal of reducing periods of deleterious imbalance between oxygen delivery and consumption. The pilot showed that clinical implementation of this combined intervention in a single centre was feasible.19 We designed a phase II trial to test the hypothesis that the burden of hypoxia and hyperoxia could be reduced by the combination of cerebral NIRS monitoring and a dedicated treatment guideline, and to demonstrate the feasibility of conducting a multicentre randomised clinical trial with a complex intervention in infants across Europe.20 The ultimate goal would be to increase the survival of preterm infants without severe neurodevelopmental impairment.


This is a phase II randomised, blinded, feasibility trial of a medical device. The protocol is published elsewhere20 and is available in full at It was approved by each hospital’s local research ethics committee, and, where required (Austria, Denmark, France, and Switzerland) by the competent authority responsible for medical devices. An independent data and safety monitoring committee reviewed the interim safety results. The study was monitored locally according to the International Conference on Harmonisation guideline for good clinical practice.21


Participants were recruited from the departments of neonatology by the attending neonatologists or the local research staff in Hopital Femme Mere Enfants, Lyon, France; Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain; Cork University Maternity Hospital, Cork, Ireland; Wilhelmina Children’s Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria; Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy; and Rosie Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals, United Kingdom.

Inclusion criteria were infants born more than 12 weeks before term (gestational age <27 weeks and six days) with a decision to provide full life support and the possibility to start cerebral NIRS monitoring within three hours after birth. Written informed consent from the parents was mandatory before inclusion and randomisation.

Cerebral NIRS monitoring

Based on data recorded with the cerebral oximeter INVOS 5100c using the adult SomaSensor (SAFB-SM) (Covidien, Boulder, CO) on more than 400 preterm infants at the Wilhelmina Children’s Hospital in Utrecht, the normal range of rStO2 in stable very preterm infants has been defined to be from 55% to 85% during the first 72 hours of life (Petra Lemmers and Frank van Bel, Utrecht, unpublished data). This range is considered safe and the boundary thresholds for possible interventions as listed in our treatment guidelines.18

Some NIRS devices and sensors have systematic differences.22 23 24 We tested the suitability of devices by comparing absolute values, repeatability, and sensitivity to changes in oxygenation on the adult forearm.25 26 The predefined criteria were absolute values and a dynamic range within 5% points of the INVOS oximeter and absolute repeatability better than 6% (within participant standard deviation) for acceptability of devices. Eligible devices were the INVOS 5100C with adult SomaSensor, NIRO 300, and NIRO 200NX with small probe holder (Hamamatsu Phototonics, Hamamatsu City, Japan), and the NONIN EQUANOX 7600 with adult sensor, model 8004CA (Nonin Medical, Plymouth, MN).


We randomised the infants to either the experimental group with cerebral NIRS monitoring with visible reading of rStO2 or the control group with cerebral NIRS monitoring with blinded rStO2. Monitoring was started within three hours of birth and ended at 72 hours of life. In both groups the rStO2 was recorded every five or six seconds, depending on the device. In the experimental group an rStO2 alarm warned when a burden of 0.2%hours (12%min) had accumulated during the past 10 minutes.19 A dedicated treatment guideline (see supplementary file) was available for the clinical staff, listing possible interventions to normalise an out of range rStO2. The interventions were focused on respiratory and circulatory support. It was emphasised that all other variables, such as blood pressure, arterial saturation, and partial pressure of carbon dioxide, should be kept within the target ranges in use in each unit. The treatment guideline is described in detail elsewhere.18

Randomisation and masking

The web based randomisation was set up and handled by the Copenhagen Trial Unit according to a computer generated allocation sequence of 1:1 with block sizes 4 and 6 in random order concealed for the investigators. The allocation was stratified for gestational age (<26 weeks or ≥26 weeks). Singleton infants were randomised individually and twins were allocated to the same treatment group. If both twins could not be included owing to lack of equipment, we included the infant born last. Owing to a lack of NIRS devices in each unit, higher order of multiple births could not be randomised.

The NIRS devices were either locked in a box, or we used a device specific research mode rStO2 blinding. All data were sent real time to a laptop. Software developed specifically for the study could either show or conceal the current rStO2 depending on group allocation. Attending clinical staff manually entered the details of repositioning of the sensor, as well as physiological variables, such as blood pressure, mean airway pressure, and blood gas variables (pH, partial pressure of carbon dioxide, and partial pressure of oxygen. In addition, the treatment interventions during the intervention period such as treatment of a patent ductus arteriosus and number of blood transfusions were recorded in the case record forms in both groups.

Outcomes, adherence, and adverse events

The prespecified primary outcome was the time spent outside the target range of 55-85% multiplied by the mean absolute deviation during the first 72 hours after birth (burden of hypoxia and hyperoxia), expressed in percentage hours (%hours) (fig 1). One hour with an oxygenation of 50% gives 5%hours of hypoxia. This figure could range from 0 to 3960%hours (55%×72 hours) per participant. The burden was computed blinded to allocation group from the raw rStO2 data and extrapolated to 72 hours. There was no manual removal of artefacts in the rStO2 data as there are no reliable ways for these to be identified.


Fig 1 Schematic illustration of concept of burden of hypoxia and hyperoxia and the alarm. rStO2=regional tissue haemoglobin oxygen saturation

The secondary outcomes were all cause mortality at term equivalent age and a brain injury score determined by ultrasonography, as assigned by central, blinded reading of still images of 13 prespecified slices (coronal and sagittal) at ages 1, 4, 7, 14, and 35 days and at term equivalent age. This brain injury score is based on the occurrence and severity of intracranial haemorrhages, white matter abnormalities, ventricular dilation, and cerebral atrophy and is described in detail in the protocol ( The secondary outcome amplitude integrated electroencephalography has not yet been analysed and will be reported separately. Exploratory outcomes were serious and non-serious adverse reactions, burden of hypoxia, burden of hyperoxia, bronchopulmonary dysplasia (defined as the need for supplementary oxygen at 36 weeks of gestation), necrotising enterocolitis modified Bell’s stage 2 or 3,27 and retinopathy of prematurity stage 3 or worse.28

Statistical analyses

Sample size estimation

The sample size estimation was based on unpublished data on 23 extremely preterm infants with a mean burden of 76.0 (SD 83.2) %hours. We log transformed the data to achieve a normal distribution with a mean of 1.64 (SD 0.50). The sample size estimation was based on the assumptions to detect a 50% reduction or more in burden of hypoxia and hyperoxia (mean difference of 0.3 after log transformation), a type I error (α) of 5%, a power of 95%, a twin proportion of 30%, and an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.33.29 This required a total sample size of 166 infants, approximately 83 per intervention group.


All analyses were based on the intention to treat principle and conducted blinded, with two sided tests at the 0.05 level of significance. A mixed model for continuous outcome variables with random intercepts corresponding to “birth clusters” and ordinary logistic regression for binary (and ordinal) outcome variables was planned per protocol. We adjusted the analyses for the protocol specified variables (gestational age category and trial centre). The former model was not significantly different from a model without random intercept (P=1.00) when used for the adjusted analysis of the primary outcome. The intraclass correlation of “birth clusters” was 0.027. All variables showed only minor differences between the models. Therefore we used the reduced model without “birth clusters” in all further analyses. Multiple imputation was not necessary because of few missing values. We adjusted the P values for the secondary outcomes with Hommel’s procedure for multiplicity. Calculations with different hypothetical P values for the planned third secondary outcome (amplitude integrated electroencephalography) were done, aiming for the most conservative adjustment—that is, the highest adjusted P values.


Between 1 June 2012 and 31 December 2013 we screened 370 infants for eligibility, and 166 were randomised (fig 2). In four instances only one twin could be included. Two infants in the control group did not have any NIRS data recorded; one had consent withdrawn and there were technical problems for the other. All other data were collected per protocol for both. In the remaining children the median monitoring time with an rStO2 signal was 67.7 hours (range 0.9-71.4 hours) with 67.9 hours (interquartile range 64.7-69.0 hours) in the experimental group and 67.4 (interquartile range 63.9-68.9) hours in the control group. The variability in monitoring time was mainly due to death within the first three days of life (two infants were withdrawn from the trial by parental request and in four there were technical reasons for reduced NIRS recording time).


Fig 2 Flow of participants through study. NIRS=cerebral near infrared spectroscopy oximetry

The baseline characteristics of the two groups were similar (table 1). The 86 infants randomised to the experimental group had a median burden of hypoxia and hyperoxia of 36.1 %hours (interquartile range 9.2-79.5%hours) compared with 81.3 (38.5-181.3) %hours in the 78 infants in the control group (fig 3). In the experimental group this was a reduction of 58% (95% confidence interval 35% to 73%, P<0.001). The difference was primarily caused by a reduction in hypoxia (P=0.0012). None of the other secondary or exploratory outcomes differed statistically significantly between the groups (table 2). There was a trend towards better survival in the experimental group (table 3).


Fig 3 Burden of hypoxia and hyperoxia by treatment group. NIRS=cerebral near infrared spectroscopy oximetry

Table 1

 Baseline characteristics of infants. Values are numbers (percentages) unless stated otherwise

View this table:
Table 2

 Outcome measures. Values are number affected/number in group (percentage) unless stated otherwise

View this table:
Table 3

 Causes of death

View this table:

Of the recorded physiological variables and interventions during the intervention period in the first 72 hours of life, only the use of echocardiography and the occurrence and treatment of patent ductus arteriosus differed substantially (table 4).

Table 4

 Death, interventions, and physiological variables during intervention period of first 72 hours of life. Values are numbers (percentages) unless stated otherwise

View this table:

The eight centres contributed 6, 8, 9, 11, 21, 36, 36, and 39 participants. The intervention effect showed significant heterogeneity among the centres (P<0.001). Removal of one centre with 36 infants resulted in the heterogeneity being insignificant (P=0.62). This centre had the largest reduction in burden in the intervention group. A post hoc sensitivity analysis reducing the mean effect of the intervention in this centre to a value equal to the mean effect in the rest of the centres resulted in a significant reduction in burden of 31% (P=0.0497).

No severe adverse reactions were associated with the device, but 16 infants had skin marks from the NIRS sensors: four in the intervention group and 12 in the control group (P=0.03). The INVOS 5100C and NIRO 200NX were used in six and two centres, respectively.


Cerebral oxygenation can be stabilised in extremely preterm infants during the first three days of life by using cerebral near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) oximetry monitoring combined with a dedicated treatment guideline. The trial was not powered to detect differences in clinical outcomes, but we found an unexpected, borderline significant reduction of all cause mortality at term equivalent age in the NIRS group. We encountered no severe adverse reactions, but 10% of the infants developed skin marks possibly from pressure or heat from the NIRS sensors.

Strengths and limitations of this study

The strengths of the trial include early and continuous monitoring during the important transitional phase, utilisation of a specific and evidence based treatment guideline,18 dedicated software that supports the implementation of the treatment guideline, and a “burden alarm” that warns when hypoxia or hyperoxia is accumulating. Multiple centres and the use of several NIRS devices ensure greater generalisability if the findings. The limitations of cerebral NIRS are poor repeatability of measurements and differences between the varied devices, which we systematically dealt with by pretrial testing and comparisons between the devices.24 25

This study has several limitations. Firstly, repositioning of the NIRS sensor can change the regional tissue haemoglobin oxygen saturation (rStO2).12 30 Out of range rStO2 values will on average tend to normalise after the sensor has been repositioned (regression towards the mean). This means that any repositioning motivated by out of range rStO2 values will introduce a bias on the primary outcome reducing out of range rStO2 only in the group with visible NIRS. Secondly, the combination of NIRS monitoring and a treatment guideline is a complex intervention and many factors influence how this interacts with the standard care of infants. The treatment guideline is a list of possible interventions and leaves the choice to the discretion of the attending clinical staff. One centre used cerebral NIRS as part of standard monitoring before the start of the trial; the remaining centres had no experience with rStO2 guided treatment. A learning curve would thus be expected. Thirdly, blinding of group allocation to clinical staff was not possible. This could lead to selective collateral intervention in one of the treatment groups leading to biased intervention effects.31 32 33 34 We reduced the impact of this problem by centralised outcome assessments blinded to intervention group.

The intervention effect differed significantly among the centres. The centre causing this heterogeneity had four dedicated neonatologists doing all trial related clinical management, working in shifts during the intervention period of 72 hours, whereas the other centres had regular clinical staff attending the study participants. It is thus not surprising that this centre had the largest treatment effect. On the other hand it is also possible that bias was increased by close attention to the cerebral oximetry signal and repositioning of the sensor. We therefore did the sensitivity analysis, which demonstrated a reduced, but still significant effect. In future larger trials it will be important to ensure a more homogenous intervention by education of staff.

Clinical outcomes

The clinical outcomes did not differ significantly. In the experimental NIRS group we saw trends towards a reduction in severe brain injury and, surprisingly, all cause mortality. We assume that a reduction in burden of hypoxia and hyperoxia can reduce the risk of brain injury and impaired neurodevelopmental but not necessarily impact on survival. However, cerebral oxygenation may serve as an indicator of the sufficiency of systemic circulation and as such help to ensure sufficient oxygenation of other vital organs during the first critical days. The list of causes of death did not suggest any particular causal pathway. Another simple explanation for the potential benefit of being in the experimental group could be the extra attention paid to the infants by the clinical staff motivated by the alarms. In contrast, the trends towards increased risk of bronchopulmonary dysplasia and retinopathy of prematurity could represent unwanted effects of increased oxygenation.35 There was, however, no major differences in fractional inspired oxygen, peripheral capillary oxygen saturation, or mean airway pressure (table 4). The record of interventions suggested a difference in approach only for echocardiography and detection and treatment of patent ductus arteriosus. The benefits of treating patent ductus arteriosus, however, remain contentious.36 Lastly, skin marks were more common in the control group. This may suggest poorer peripheral perfusion or may be simply due to less careful handling of the sensor in the blinded group.

Trials of cerebral oximetry in other patient groups

We have not been able to identify similar trials in this population. Two randomised clinical trials in adults during cardiac surgery compared visible cerebral NIRS monitoring with blinded NIRS monitoring.37 38 Murkin and colleagues reduced prolonged cerebral desaturations and found a shorter stay in the intensive care unit and less combined mortality and morbidity in the experimental group.37 Slater and colleagues found no difference in cerebral rStO2 between the two groups possibly due to poor implementation of the intervention.38 Both these trials had a predefined decrease from baseline rStO2 as a threshold for intervention, which is an approach to reduce the effect of the imprecision of NIRS oximetry. This is, however, not possible in neonatology as most ill infants are compromised from birth, thus the baseline rStO2 cannot be assumed to be safe. Furthermore, the sensor has to be repositioned repeatedly for long time monitoring. We have to rely on the absolute value of rStO2 and on absolute thresholds for intervention.

Trials in preterm infants with clinically relevant outcomes are needed

The present results do not yet support the routine application of cerebral NIRS in extremely preterm infants. Although there were trends towards benefit and no record of serious adverse reactions, cerebral NIRS is demanding and may have unwanted effects. NIRS requires manipulation of vulnerable extremely preterm infants, requires additional staff time, and is costly in economical terms. As such, definitive evidence of benefit for improvement of clinically relevant outcomes is needed. We plan on doing a neurodevelopmental outcome assessment at two years corrected age; this phase II trial did not have the power to detect a difference. Therefore, further randomised clinical trials are needed. Such trials require a substantially greater number of infants to assess clinically relevant outcomes and thus require the involvement of many more centres. Several factors must be dealt with in the planning of such phase III trials. The appropriateness of the rStO2 thresholds for intervention should be reconsidered and new appraisals of the available NIRS oximeters should be made to take advantage of technical improvements. The treatment guideline should be reviewed. A training and certification programme for clinical staff should be provided before the start of such a trial.


In summary, the burden of cerebral hypoxia and hyperoxia was significantly reduced in extremely preterm infants monitored by NIRS and treated according to a dedicated treatment guideline. To assess the long term benefit and harm of the combination of NIRS and an updated treatment guideline, larger randomised clinical trials are needed.

What is already known on this topic

  • Extremely preterm infants are at risk of neurodevelopmental impairment

  • Cerebral near infrared spectometry (NIRS) oximetry enables continuous estimation of the oxygen balance of the brain tissue and has been shown to correlate with clinical outcome

  • The possibility of cerebral oxygen imbalance being reduced by a dedicated treatment guideline in extremely preterm infants has not yet been tested in a randomised trial

What this study adds

  • The combination of cerebral NIRS oximetry and a dedicated treatment guideline reduced the amount of oxygen imbalance in the brain of extremely preterm infants during the first three days of life

  • No severe adverse reactions were associated with the device

  • Larger trials powered for relevant clinical outcomes are needed to test the clinical relevance of the present findings


Cite this as: BMJ 2015;350:g7635


  • We thank the families, nurses, doctors, and research assistants who took part in the trial; Jørn Wetterslev (Copenhagen Trial Unit) for help with the sample size estimation taking twins into consideration; and Heike Rabe (Southampton), Jan Miletin (Dublin), and Armin Kock (Tübingen) for their contribution as the data safety monitoring committee. The European Clinical Research Infrastructures Network ( reviewed the protocol and supported the trial.

  • Local investigators: Paloma López-Ortego, María Carmen Bravo, Marta Ybarra, Fernando Cabañas, Berndt Urlesberger, Corinna Binder, Mmoloki Kenosi, Gavin Hawkes, Ida Sirgiovanni, Ita Herlihy, Andrea Edwards, and Cristine Sortica da Costa. Janus Engstrøm, data manager and electronic case record form developer, The Copenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research.

  • Contributors: SH-S, AP, TA, TAU, FvB, MB, OC, ED, MF, CG, BG, CH, PL, AMP, PW, GP, WvO, GP, MW and GG conceived and designed the study. SH-S, MB, CG, BG, CH, WvO, AMP, and GG designed the data collection instruments. JR designed the boxes for blinding the device displays and designed and maintained the NIRS data collection software. SH-S, AP, TA, TA, FvB, MB, OC, ED, ARF, MF, CH, PL, GP, AMP, LS, and GG assisted with acquisition of the data. SH-S, MB, CG, CH, WvO, AMP, PW, and GG analysed the data. SH-S, CG, and GG wrote the initial draft. SH-S, CG, BG, AMP, and GG provided administrative, technical, and material support and supervised the study. All authors critically reviewed revised versions of the paper and approved the final draft for submission. All the authors had access to the data and contributed substantially to the submitted report. SH-S and GG are the guarantors.

  • Funding: This work was supported by an unconditional and unrestricted grant from the Danish Council for Strategic Research (DKK 11,100,105). The funder had no role in the design, conduct, or analysis of the trial.

  • Competing interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at and declare: no support from any organisation for the submitted work; no financial relationships with any organisations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

  • Ethical approval: This study was approved by the local ethics committees: clinical research ethics committee of the Cork Teaching Hospitals (EMC 3 (xxx) 03/07/12); NRES Committee East of England—Cambridge South (12/EE/0329); Ethikkommission Medizinische Universität Graz (24-261 ex (11/12)); De Videnskabetiske Komiteer—Region Hovedstaden (H-4-2012-028); CPP Sud-Est III—Lyon (HCL/P 2012.728); Direzione Scientifica-Comitato di Etica—The IRCCS Fondazione Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico (549/12-all.3); Medisch Ethische Toetsingscommissie—Universitair Medisch Centrum Utrecht (WAG/rc/12/ 036774); and Comité Ético de Investigación Clínica del Hospital Universitario “La Paz” de Madrid (15/2011). All participants gave informed consent before taking part in the trial.

  • Data sharing: Patient level data are available at from the corresponding author at request. Consent was not obtained but the presented data are anonymised and risk of identification is low.

  • Transparency: SH-S affirms that the manuscript is an honest, accurate, and transparent account of the study being reported; that no important aspects of the study have been omitted; and that any discrepancies from the study as planned (and, if relevant, registered) have been explained.

This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See:


View Abstract