Why there’s no point telling me to lose weight
BMJ 2015; 350 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g6845 (Published 20 January 2015) Cite this as: BMJ 2015;350:g6845
All rapid responses
Rapid responses are electronic comments to the editor. They enable our users to debate issues raised in articles published on bmj.com. A rapid response is first posted online. If you need the URL (web address) of an individual response, simply click on the response headline and copy the URL from the browser window. A proportion of responses will, after editing, be published online and in the print journal as letters, which are indexed in PubMed. Rapid responses are not indexed in PubMed and they are not journal articles. The BMJ reserves the right to remove responses which are being wilfully misrepresented as published articles or when it is brought to our attention that a response spreads misinformation.
From March 2022, the word limit for rapid responses will be 600 words not including references and author details. We will no longer post responses that exceed this limit.
The word limit for letters selected from posted responses remains 300 words.
I have been studying the stigma of obesity and I have been guilty of being discriminatory myself. Thinking weight loss was simply a matter of calories intake being greater than expenditure; and that everyone could just change their eating to healthy low fat and sugar choices (with calorie reduction) and commence or do more exercise. I now realise that there is much more to it than that from experiences in my family as well as formal study. I want to compliment Emma on an excellent portrayal of her experiences with health professionals so far. I am very happy for Emma that she has overcome her low self esteem and has found enjoyment in exercise. I sincerely hope that she does not have to suffer any more negativity and is happy in her skin from hereon in. Best wishes Emma
Competing interests: No competing interests
In response to some of the other comments on this article, I would like to point out that Emma Lewis does not actually use the title "Ms" (source: personal correspondence). Another commonly-made assumption which can be harmful!
Competing interests: No competing interests
I think the answer is partly in your title: telling someone something that they know already is pointless. There is a big difference between unsolicited health advice and working with a patient to achieve a goal that is important to them. Most smokers want to quit smoking but can't, or find it difficult without support. Should we wait until patients present with COPD or lung cancer before we offer smoking cessation services?
My colleagues and I at King’s College London have been analysing hundreds of reflective accounts by senior medical students of consultations with obese patients. These reveal that broaching the subject in a way that leaves the patient in control, such as "would you like to talk about your weight today?", "do you have any concerns about your weight/are you happy about your weight?" can lead to some amazing conversations with patients who described, as you do, feeling previously judged and hounded. The agenda for the consultation is still being led by the patient, but it doesn't require the doctor to be entirely passive.
That being said, if a patient answers no to the first question (and especially if they are in recovery from Binge Eating Disorder!) there should be some way of respecting the patient's preference for how they would like to be approached about the subject, or not, in the future.
Competing interests: No competing interests
I would be absolutely thrilled to have an obese patient be as frank as Ms. Lewis.
Even better would getting insurers, government, professional bodies off my case for not making Ms. Lewis thinner.
http://www.npr.org/blogs/health/2015/02/23/387529382/lots-of-seniors-are...
The best thing would be for (Ms. Lewis/obese patients) to partner with (me/us) to explain to lawmakers that I can't control another adult's behaviors!
Competing interests: No competing interests
Emma Lewis has written an excellent article demonstrating the stigmatising and negative effects on health of well-meaning but ultimately insensitive and flawed interventions on the “problem” of overweight and obesity by GPs. Notwithstanding the important issues Emma raises, a significant further problem may well be the common conflation of these two categories.
Emma describes herself as having a lifelong BMI of over 30, thus falling into the “obese” category. Yet, in a rapid response Simon Howard suggests that one of her key messages is not supported by the evidence because many “overweight” people do not recognize their own overweight [1]. Of course, the evidence to support this focuses on a BMI of 25-30 [2], not the obese category of a BMI of 30+. Commonly in the media, everyone with a BMI of over 25 is condemned as “fat”, this despite increasing and converging evidence that the overweight BMI range of 25-30 has a lower all-cause mortality risk than the “normal” category of 18.5-25 [3, 4, 5].
One important “key message”, therefore, should be that many of those often labeled “fat” have a largely low-risk BMI of 25-30, and perhaps do not recognize themselves as “overweight” because the technical BMI definition of overweight bears little resemblance to a common understanding of what “fat” looks like, nor to a statistical elevated all-cause mortality risk. Perhaps, then, next time we read about the problem of overweight and obesity, we should ask of ourselves and others: Who are YOU calling fat?
[1] Howard SJ. One minor factual correction. Rapid response to: Lewis E. Why there’s no point telling me to lose weight. BMJ 2015; 350: g6845 (http://www.bmj.com/content/350/bmj.g6845/rr-35)
[2] Health and Social Care Information Centre (2013) Health Survey for England 2012: Adult anthropometric measures, overweight and obesity
[3] Flegal KM, Kit BK, Orpana H, Graubard BI. (2013). Association of All-Cause Mortality With Overweight and Obesity Using Standard Body Mass Index Categories: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA 2013; 309(1): 71-82.
[4] McGee DL; Diverse Populations Collaboration. Body Mass Index and Mortality. Ann Epidemiology. 2005; 15(2): 87-97.
[5] Orpana HM, Berthelot JM, Kaplan MS, et al. BMI and Mortality. Obesity; 2010; 18(1): 214-218.
Competing interests: No competing interests
Many thanks to Emma Lewis for a thought-provoking and eloquent article. I do not wish to disagree with the thrust of the article, but wanted to point out that one "key message" is not supported by the evidence.
Lewis claims that "Fat people know that they are fat." The best available evidence suggests that many fat people do not know that they are fat. Most overweight men and a third of overweight women do not recognise their own overweight.[1] Additionally, most parents of overweight children do not recognise that their child is overweight.[2]
Hence, Lewis's own insight into her own overweight is not reflective of the wider population—though this should not detract from her central message of tailoring conversations and advice to individuals and their personal needs.
[1] Health and Social Care Information Centre (2013) Health Survey for England 2012: Adult anthropometric measures, overweight and obesity
[2] Jeffrey AN, Voss LD, Metclaf BS, Alba S, Wilkin TJ (2004) Parents’ awareness of overweight in themselves and their children: cross sectional study within a cohort (EarlyBird 21) BMJ 2004;330:23
Competing interests: No competing interests
I read this article with great interest and agree with the first key message to 'focus on what the patient has come to see you about today'. Having worked as an FY2 in general practice this was something I always tried to do. However, it was incredibly difficult to see any patient without the patient management system alerting me to various QOF indicators and targets that needed to be met for the patient. Whilst GPs have an important role in promoting primary prevention of disease it is vital to recognise the challenge that this poses when the patient comes with their own agenda for the 10 minute consultation. And it is even more important to recognise how a discussion of other issues such as weight loss, exercise and smoking cessation may be perceived by the patient when they are consulting you about something unrelated.
Competing interests: No competing interests
This excellent essay spotlights a serious yet neglected problem in patient care: many obese patients avoid medical visits to dodge the scolding lectures that too often take the place of appropriate care. Whether the essayist or her physicians were "correct" or not is immaterial. The important issue is the consequence of a physician's speech. Words can be therapeutic if properly crafted. Harsh and judgmental words can drive a patient away from the medical system all together with disastrous consequences. At my medical school, students are ask to put themselves in the patient's place. The empathic physician realizes that the obese patient does not need to be told their BMI is high. They need effective and immediate treatment for their chief complaint. If and when the patient asks for help losing weight, this is where an effective patient-physician team can formulate a plan. Too many physicians believe that weight loss is a cure-all that will erase any condition that befalls an obese person. The practitioner's faith in weight loss as a panacea is puzzling, given how seldom reversal of obesity is seen in practice. Rethink your approach the next time you recommend weight loss as the only possible treatment. Ask yourself, "Do normal weight people ever get this?" The answer will be "yes" as there is no disease unique to the obese. Then ask, "If this patient were thin, what treatment would I recommend?" Then adopt that plan for your obese patient.
Competing interests: No competing interests
Some responses have suggested, at times patronisingly, that better consultation techniques are key to discussing weight loss but, if I’ve read her article correctly, Ms Lewis is saying that she simply doesn’t want any discussion of her weight if she sees a doctor for other reasons. Indeed, she comments “I’ve opted out of the weight loss game.” Ms Lewis is absolutely within her rights to take this stance but clinicians seem damned if they attempt to discuss weight and damned if they don’t, given the pressure on them to stem the increasing tide of weight-related illnesses.
Patients are entitled to have ‘no-go’ areas for discussion of any aspects of their lives and these must be respected but it can be difficult for doctors to know what these might be at the start of any consultation. Perhaps one solution would be for patients to state at the start that particular topics are off-limits. Unless they change, these preferences could be included in their records to help in future consultations and to explain to any bureaucrats, who are capable of understanding, why some targets might be missed.
There’s no denying that losing excess weight can be very difficult but the belief that ‘diets don’t work’ is rather a different matter. The strength in a belief is unrelated to its truth and Dr Goh and others have set out clearly why such a belief can be unhelpful.
Competing interests: No competing interests
Re: body analysis vs BMI as obesity measure
Dear Editor
BMI is one marker for obesity, but not always relevant. Both the author and the practitioners focus entirely on this marker, not unusual either.
I would be very interested to know what a body analysis would show. They measure % fat, % muscle, % water and bone mass.
Competing interests: No competing interests