Effect of mobile telephone reminders on treatment outcome in HIV
BMJ 2014; 349 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/sbmj.g7393 (Published 19 December 2014) Cite this as: BMJ 2014;349:g7393- Neil Chanchlani, foundation year two doctor1,
- James Goodhand, specialist registrar in gastroenterology2
- 1Colchester General Hospital, Essex, UK
- 2Barts Health NHS Trust, Newham University Hospital, London, UK
The paper
Shet A, DeCosta A, Kumarasamy N, Rodrigues R, Rewari BB, Ashorn P, et al. Effect of mobile telephone reminders on treatment outcome in HIV: evidence from a randomised controlled trial in India. BMJ 2014;349:g5978.
Objective—To assess whether customised mobile phone reminders would improve adherence to therapy and thus decrease virological failure among patients with HIV starting antiretroviral treatment (ART).
Design—Randomised controlled trial among patients with HIV initiating antiretroviral treatment.
Setting—Three diverse healthcare delivery settings in south India: two ambulatory clinics within the Indian national programme and one private HIV healthcare clinic.
Participants—631 HIV, ART naïve, adult patients eligible to initiate first line ART were randomly assigned to mobile phone intervention (n=315) or standard care (n=316) and followed for 96 weeks.
Intervention—The intervention consisted of customised, interactive, automated voice reminders, and a pictorial message that were sent weekly to the patients’ mobile phones for the duration of the study.
Main outcome measures—The primary outcome was time to virological failure (viral load >400 copies/mL on two consecutive measurements). Secondary outcomes included ART adherence measured by pill count, death rate, and attrition rate. Suboptimal adherence was defined as mean adherence <95%.
Results—Using an intention to treat approach we found no observed difference in time to virological failure between the allocation groups: failures in the intervention and standard care arms were 49/315 (15.6%) and 49/316 (15.5%) respectively (unadjusted hazard ratio 0.98, 95% confidence interval 0.67 to 1.47, P=0.95). The rate of virological failure in the intervention and standard care groups were 10.52 and 10.73 per 100 person years respectively. Comparison of suboptimal adherence was similar between both groups (unadjusted incidence rate ratio 1.24, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.65, P=0.14). Incidence proportion of patients with suboptimal adherence was 81/300 (27.0%) in the …
Log in
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Subscribe from £184 *
Subscribe and get access to all BMJ articles, and much more.
* For online subscription
Access this article for 1 day for:
£50 / $60/ €56 (excludes VAT)
You can download a PDF version for your personal record.