Making music in the operating theatre
BMJ 2014; 349 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g7436 (Published 11 December 2014) Cite this as: BMJ 2014;349:g7436- David C Bosanquet, surgical registrar,
- James CD Glasbey, foundation year 1 doctor,
- Raphael Chavez, consultant general and transplant surgeon
- Correspondence to: D C Bosanquet davebosanquet{at}hotmail.com
One hundred years ago, Pennsylvanian surgeon Evan Kane penned a brief letter to JAMA in which he declared himself a rigorous proponent of the “benefic [sic] effects of the phonograph within the operating room.” To Kane, it was an optimal means of “calming and distracting the patient from the horror of their situation.” Perhaps it was by harnessing these distracting properties that he was able to face the operating room as both patient and surgeon, becoming the first person to perform an auto-appendicectomy in 1920. A century later, although we have more in our anaesthetic armamentarium than distraction, music can still bring a calming effect to the operating team and surgical patient.
Music and healing share an intertwined history. As early as 4000 BC the Codex haburami (hallelujah to the healer), delivered by harp playing priests and musicians, served as part payment for medicinal services. Aristotle recognised the innate ability of melodies to surpass “feelings such as pity and fear, or enthusiasm,” and thus “heal and purify the soul.” The Greeks identified Apollo as the father of both healing and music, alongside his many other accolades (as God of light, sun, truth, prophecy, plague and poetry). Two physicians famed for using their musical abilities to implement medical achievements described chest percussion (Leopold Joseph Auenbrugger, 1722-1809) and invented the stethoscope (Rene Theophile Hyacinthe Laennec, 1781-1826). Music therapy, probably first referenced in a 1789 article in the Columbia Magazine entitled “Music physically considered,” matured into an acceptable treatment in the 19th and 20th centuries. The psychological and physiological benefits of musical accompaniment to medical care have been replicated consistently across a range of randomised controlled trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses.
Surgical effects
Aside from a more general effect on health, numerous data specifically support music for patients having surgery under local or general anaesthesia. In a randomised trial of 372 patients having elective surgery, relaxing melodies (60-80 bpm, mimicking the resting heart rate) proved to be superior to midazolam as a pre-anaesthetic anxiolytic.1 Combined data suggest that this calming effect is maintained before, during (when awake), and after surgery,2 with music faring better than noise blocking devices alone.3 For patients requiring further respiratory support postoperatively, music’s ability to reduce anxiety, heart rate, and respiratory rate extends even to ventilated patients in intensive care.4 5
Music has also been shown to have pain relieving opioid sparing properties.6 Although the analgesic effects may seem modest compared with those of drugs, the intervention comes at minimal cost, without side effects, and can be started and withdrawn immediately at the patient’s request.
But does music strike a chord with the surgeon and the theatre staff? It is certainly commonplace, being played 62-72% of time in theatre, and most often chosen by the leading surgeon.7 Around 80% of theatre staff report that music benefits communication between team members, reducing anxiety levels and improving efficiency.7 Music also seems to enhance surgical performance by increasing task focus, particularly among surgeons who listen to music regularly. Various studies (albeit mostly simulation based) have shown music to aid task completion while lowering muscle fatigue and physiological markers of stress.8
Matters of choice
Classical music predominates as the music of choice in the operating theatre, perhaps because of its ability to “evoke mental vigilance”9 and the absence of lyrics. An alternative explanation is the inherent personality traits of the surgeon. Pearson and Dollinger have shown a link between the Myers Briggs “sensing-intuition” dimension and musical preference; predominantly “intuitive” people, which surgeons often are, show an appreciation for a wide range of music types, particularly classical.10 Although most mainstream music is considered “theatre appropriate” we suggest tunes likely to resonate harmoniously with the operating environment, alongside musical faux pas best avoided (box).
Suggestions for songs to play and to avoid in the operating theatre
Songs for surgery
“Stayin’ Alive” (Bee Gees, 1997)—Though a great suggestion for the patient, operating team members should resist the urge to emulate John Travolta’s expansive dance routine. Doubles as a metronome for correct cardiac compression rate in the disastrous event of an on-table cardiac arrest.
“Smooth Operator” (Sade, 1984)—The exemplar of feel good operating, and a must for all theatre mix-tapes.
“Un-break My Heart” (Toni Braxton, 1996)—Ideal for cardiac surgery. Can be followed by “I’ll Never Break Your Heart” (Backstreet Boys, 1995) and (to lighten the mood) “Achy Breaky Heart” (Billy Ray Cyrus, 1992)
“Comfortably Numb” (Pink Floyd, 1980)—Suggested listening while waiting for a spinal or epidural anaesthetic to take effect. Avoid repeated exposure as lyrics may cause dangerous introspection
“Fix You” (Coldplay, 2005)—Suitable for those wishing to harness the full healing power of Chris Martin. Expect miracles
“Wake Me Up Before You Go-Go” (Wham, 1984)—Best played in recovery. Handover to recovery staff should not take longer than the duration of the song. Exit from recovery should be backwards, crouched, and with finger clicking
Songs (and groups) to avoid
“Another One Bites the Dust” (Queen, 1980)—Also avoid “Killer Queen” (1974), especially with female anaesthetics/surgeons.
“Everybody Hurts” (REM, 1992)—No patient appreciates receiving such a repetitive reminder
“Knives Out” (Radiohead, 2001)—Not only likely to increase patient anxiety but will bring melancholy to the theatre. Staff may question the meaningless of existence
“Scar Tissue” (Red Hot Chilli Peppers, 1999)—Plastic surgeons should avoid this at all cost, which is a pity considering its fantastic riffs and slide guitar solos
House of Pain (Hip Hop trio, 1991-96, 2000-01)—Likely to increase analgesic requirements, although the single “Jump Around” (1992) may shorten operative time considerably
So with this plethora of benefits for patient, surgeon, and theatre staff, shouldn’t music be a universal accompaniment in theatres? Critics, among whom anaesthetic staff predominate, most commonly argue that music consumes cognitive bandwidth, reduces vigilance, impairs communication, and proves a distraction when anaesthetic problems are encountered.11 Other studies (again small observational and often simulation based) have shown that music increases the time taken to acquire skills (particularly for trainees), slows overall completion time for procedures, and increases general irritation.8 12
Surgeons will inevitably continue to use music as a calming and familiar adjunct to their daily practice. Although the intangible value of patient and practitioner preference should not be overlooked, noise levels should be monitored and balanced to ensure minimal potential for interfering with communication. Musical accompaniment may be less appropriate during training, when concentration should be on the task alone. Though most practitioners favour the use of music, each theatre will need to reach a (preferably harmonious) consensus. We however, embrace music in the operating theatre whenever the situation allows it.
Notes
Cite this as: BMJ 2014;349:g7436
Footnotes
Competing interests: We have read and understood BMJ policy on declaration of interests and have no relevant interests to declare.
Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.