Use of clarithromycin and roxithromycin and risk of cardiac death: cohort study
BMJ 2014; 349 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g4930 (Published 19 August 2014) Cite this as: BMJ 2014;349:g4930All rapid responses
Rapid responses are electronic comments to the editor. They enable our users to debate issues raised in articles published on bmj.com. A rapid response is first posted online. If you need the URL (web address) of an individual response, simply click on the response headline and copy the URL from the browser window. A proportion of responses will, after editing, be published online and in the print journal as letters, which are indexed in PubMed. Rapid responses are not indexed in PubMed and they are not journal articles. The BMJ reserves the right to remove responses which are being wilfully misrepresented as published articles or when it is brought to our attention that a response spreads misinformation.
From March 2022, the word limit for rapid responses will be 600 words not including references and author details. We will no longer post responses that exceed this limit.
The word limit for letters selected from posted responses remains 300 words.
It was good to read an article written on an antibiotic molecule which is used widely in this country. There is an understanding of potential risk of using macrolide antibiotic. But I am not aware of a study having been done to quantify the risk in comparison with other class of commonly used antibiotics. Even though the overall risk is not that significant in comparison with other drugs, the risk with clarithromycin use is approximately double compared to risk of using penicillin-V.
This study has quite a few good points (to name a few, good age range, number of antibiotics course use, seven day course, among others).
The impact of this type of study can be really huge. Some of the reasons why the use of clarithromycin has increased are – cost of a course of antibiotics is not very costly, it is reasonably well tolerated, the incidence of developing allergy/sensitivity is not high, it is widely available, it has different formulations, it is a reasonably stable molecule, and a sizeable population is allergic to penicillin (among others).
But I think it would be good to carry out/commission another prospective randomized, double blind study on the use of clarithromycin, covering primary care and secondary care, in different centres, preferably different countries. This would be especially to iron out and equate (if possible) various confounding factors so that there is more certainity that any risk shown is associated with the antibiotic in question.
Competing interests: No competing interests
This article by Svanström, Pasternak and Hviid is an important addition to the growing literature on the association between macrolides and their effect on cardiac mortality (1).
However, we believe their argument could be strengthened by the addition of data on both what the patient presented with and what they departed with (or rather, the mechanism by which they departed). By controlling for each drug on the basis of their prescription, a better comparison could be made regarding the relevant propensity to sustain cardiac complications (ultimately, in some cases, fatal). The paper states that “The indications for clarithromycin, roxithromycin, and penicillin V overlap”; however, this statement does not quantitatively address the question as to whether, for example, clarithromycin is simply more regularly prescribed to sicker patients, whom are more likely to have a rapid decline and demise, potentially from a cardiac origin, despite the antibiotic. Respiratory pathology and decreased lung function are associated with an increased frequency of cardiovascular disease and fatality in cardiac events, behaving in a disease dependent manner (2,3). Considering exact variations in patient presentation is not covered for in the exclusion criteria, controlling for the initial physiological compromise at prescription would be a useful addition to the study. However, we question whether the addition of more such variables to the propensity score would negatively affect the significance of the results: the confidence intervals are already dangerously wide for a study with such a large number of participants – 1.08 to 2.85 being close to ‘statistical insignificance’. Therefore, even greater sample sizes would perhaps be warranted.
Secondly, although the authors do add the ICD-10 disease classifications their results pertain to, they do not stratify according to the specific cardiac cause of mortality. A prolonged QT interval is generally described as the primary proposed mechanism of macrolide-induced cardiac death (from Torsades de pointes) (4). If the data showed that all 18 deaths associated with clarithromycin were arrhythmogenic in origin, it would add strength to the suspicion of a QT-associated origin of the excess mortality. Given that females on average have a longer QT interval, it may explain their apparent increased risk demonstrated in this study (5). Indeed, a genetic predisposition is proposed by the authors (1). It is likely that cardiac mortality arises via an additive effect on the QT, along with other factors, be they genetic or otherwise. While the authors importantly attempt to control for several drugs, it is done without relevance to their relative effect on the QT interval. For example, antipsychotics do not universally prolong the QT interval (e.g. haloperidol does, but not olanzapine), and the ones that do have differing potency – yet all antipsychotics are stratified together (6). Similarly, as another example, amiodarone has also been shown to prolong the QT and is not independently controlled for (7).
Overall, the authors present a comprehensive study. We believe it would, however, benefit from our suggested additions; while this more robust approach may affect the results, a true correlation would be better demonstrated and would add weight to the proposed underlying physiological mechanism.
The authors declare no competing interests.
References
1. Svanstrom H, Pasternak B, Hviid A. Use of clarithromycin and roxithromycin and risk of cardiac death: cohort study. Bmj 2014;349:g4930.
2. Arcari A, Magnacca S, Bracone F, et al. Relation between pulmonary function and 10-year risk for cardiovascular disease among healthy men and women in Italy: the Moli-sani Project. European journal of preventive cardiology 2013;20:862-71.
3. Engstrom G, Hedblad B, Janzon L. Reduced lung function predicts increased fatality in future cardiac events. A population-based study. Journal of internal medicine 2006;260:560-7.
4. Albert RK, Schuller JL, Network CCR. Macrolide antibiotics and the risk of cardiac arrhythmias. American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine 2014;189:1173-80.
5. Stramba-Badiale M, Locati EH, Martinelli A, Courville J, Schwartz PJ. Gender and the relationship between ventricular repolarization and cardiac cycle length during 24-h Holter recordings. European heart journal 1997;18:1000-6.
6. Glassman AH, Bigger JT, Jr. Antipsychotic drugs: prolonged QTc interval, torsade de pointes, and sudden death. The American journal of psychiatry 2001;158:1774-82.
7. Torres V, Tepper D, Flowers D, et al. QT prolongation and the antiarrhythmic efficacy of amiodarone. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 1986;7:142-7.
Competing interests: No competing interests
I read with great interest the paper by Svanström et al describing an increased risk of cardiac death associated with clarithromycin.
I am surprised that the authors have not discussed two major findings of their paper: first, the fact that the absence of concomitant use of cytochrome P 450 3 A inhibitor is associated with a significant increase in cardiac death and, second, that subjects at high cardiac risk also have a significant increased risk of cardiac death.
These points are of importance because the pharmacokinetic difference between clarithromycin and roxithromycin cannot explain the differences in the result as stated in the introduction. Finally, results in subjects with a high cardiac risk score confirm data already published in the field showing increased risk of sudden cardiac death and cardiovascular death with erythromycine and azithromycine in patients with high baseline cardiovascular risk.
Competing interests: No competing interests
Re: Use of clarithromycin and roxithromycin and risk of cardiac death: cohort study
How clinically relevant is the association between clarithromycin use and cardiac use. The numbers needed to harm with clarithromycin are in the order of 1 in 17000. Is this just "noise" or would a subgroup analysis reveal an interaction with statins or drugs associated with a prolonged QT interval. This study is not going to change my practice as I would be already avoiding drugs showing an interaction.
Competing interests: No competing interests