Re: First UK prosecution for female genital mutilation raises concerns among doctors
Dear Sir,
It is right that there is a clear distinction between giving medical care to someone previously subject to FGM, such as stitches after childbirth to control bleeding, and committing an offence.
The law is clear that no offence of FGM is committed by an approved person who performs a surgical operation which is necessary for the patient’s physical or mental health, or for the purposes connected with the labour or birth. This was, of course, considered in this case.
The full facts of this case are yet to be heard in court and commentary which misunderstands the facts is unhelpful in this very important area of the law. It is also extremely important that nothing prejudices the upcoming trial.
Rapid Response:
Re: First UK prosecution for female genital mutilation raises concerns among doctors
Dear Sir,
It is right that there is a clear distinction between giving medical care to someone previously subject to FGM, such as stitches after childbirth to control bleeding, and committing an offence.
The law is clear that no offence of FGM is committed by an approved person who performs a surgical operation which is necessary for the patient’s physical or mental health, or for the purposes connected with the labour or birth. This was, of course, considered in this case.
The full facts of this case are yet to be heard in court and commentary which misunderstands the facts is unhelpful in this very important area of the law. It is also extremely important that nothing prejudices the upcoming trial.
Competing interests: No competing interests