Cross sectional studies: advantages and disadvantagesBMJ 2014; 348 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g2276 (Published 26 March 2014) Cite this as: BMJ 2014;348:g2276
- Philip Sedgwick, reader in medical statistics and medical education
- 1Centre for Medical and Healthcare Education, St George’s, University of London, London, UK
A cross sectional study design was used to investigate the extent of chronic fatigue and the associated psychosocial exposures in a developing country. The setting was a primary health centre catchment area in Goa, India. Participants were women aged 18-50 years. The primary outcome was reporting of fatigue for at least six months. Data on the primary outcome and psychosocial exposures were obtained by a structured interview. The psychosocial exposures that were investigated included mental health and gender disadvantage factors. The presence of anaemia was determined from a blood sample.1
The sampling frame consisted of 8595 eligible women listed in family health registers. In total, 3000 randomly sampled women were invited to participate and 2494 (83%) consented. Recruitment took place from November 2001 to May 2003. It was reported that 12.1% (95% confidence interval 10.8 to 13.4%) of women experienced chronic fatigue. Those psychosocial exposures most strongly associated with chronic fatigue were poor mental health and sexual violence by the husband.
Which of the following statements, if any, are true?
a) The study was longitudinal by design
b) It was possible to estimate the prevalence of chronic fatigue in women aged 18-50 years
c) It was possible to estimate the incidence of chronic fatigue in women …
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Subscribe from £173 *
Subscribe and get access to all BMJ articles, and much more.
* For online subscription
Access this article for 1 day for:
£38 / $45 / €42 (excludes VAT)
You can download a PDF version for your personal record.