Research News
Study claiming Tamiflu saved lives was based on “flawed” analysis
BMJ 2014; 348 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g2228 (Published 19 March 2014) Cite this as: BMJ 2014;348:g2228Related articles
- News Published: 23 May 2013; BMJ 346 doi:10.1136/bmj.f3371
- News Published: 04 April 2013; BMJ 346 doi:10.1136/bmj.f2157
- Letter Published: 29 April 2014; BMJ 348 doi:10.1136/bmj.g2951
- Letter Published: 29 April 2014; BMJ 348 doi:10.1136/bmj.g2935
- Letter Published: 29 April 2014; BMJ 348 doi:10.1136/bmj.g2976
- Letter Published: 30 April 2014; BMJ 348 doi:10.1136/bmj.g2990
- Letter Published: 30 April 2014; BMJ 348 doi:10.1136/bmj.g3004
- News Published: 01 June 2016; BMJ 353 doi:10.1136/bmj.i3077
See more
- Why are doctors being warned about the Oropouche virus?BMJ September 05, 2024, 386 q1944; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.q1944
- Whooping cough: Why have vaccination rates plummeted in pregnant women?BMJ August 29, 2024, 386 q1900; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.q1900
- First mpox vaccines arrive in Africa as officials work “blindly” to contain outbreaksBMJ August 29, 2024, 386 q1897; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.q1897
- Condom use in adolescents has fallen notably since 2014, warns WHOBMJ August 29, 2024, 386 q1884; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.q1884
- Test for syphilis in people with possible symptoms, says UKHSA, as cases riseBMJ August 15, 2024, 386 q1801; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.q1801
Cited by...
- Debate on whether Tamiflu prevents flu deaths reignites after new analysis
- Mark Jones's reply to Myles and Leonardi-Bee's response to his critique of their paper reported in The BMJ
- Authors' reply to Mark Jones's second critique of the study by Muthuri and colleagues reported in The BMJ
- Authors' reply to Mark Jones's critique of the study by Muthuri and colleagues reported in The BMJ
- The BMJ's activism will ultimately harm its reputation
- Principal author of PRIDE study responds to news story in The BMJ claiming that the study was based on "flawed" analysis
- Editor in chief's reply to Nguyen-Van-Tam