Poor areas lose out most in new NHS budget allocationBMJ 2014; 348 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g160 (Published 15 January 2014) Cite this as: BMJ 2014;348:g160
- Ben Barr, senior clinical lecturer in applied public health1,
- David Taylor-Robinson, Medical Research Council population health scientist1
As reported in the BMJ, NHS England has included a “deprivation indicator” in the new resource allocation formula for Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs).1 This follows concerns about an earlier proposed version of the formula, which would have shifted resources from poor areas with the worst health to more affluent areas with better health.2 We used data provided by NHS England to consider the likely equity impact of the new formula.3
With regard to the level of overall allocation, although the total CCG programme budget will increase slightly above inflation over this period,1 taking into account the predicted increase in population,3 there will be an average cut of £8 (€9.7; $13.2) per head (authors’ calculations, available on request) in real terms.
But will these cuts hit poorest areas hardest? The figure⇓ shows that CCGs serving the most deprived populations will lose out the most. This is because the new formula gives less weight to deprived areas than the current pattern of funding.
The new resource allocation is likely to increase health inequalities, despite being an improvement on the original contested proposal. The King’s Fund recommends that resource allocation should be used to deliver policy objectives.4 It is hard to see how cutting NHS resources most from areas with the worst health will help NHS England achieve its stated objective of reducing inequalities in health.5
Cite this as: BMJ 2014;348:g160
Competing interests: None declared.