Letters Trial registration and publication bias Medical journal editors and publication bias BMJ 2013; 347 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f6170 (Published 22 October 2013) Cite this as: BMJ 2013;347:f6170 Article Related content Metrics Responses Peer review Related articles Correspondence Proposal to outlaw the term “negative trial” Published: 30 March 1985; Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 290 doi:10.1136/bmj.290.6473.1002 Research “Hardly worth the effort”? Medical journals’ policies and their editors’ and publishers’ views on trial registration and publication bias: quantitative and qualitative study Published: 06 September 2013; BMJ 347 doi:10.1136/bmj.f5248 See more First mpox vaccines arrive in Africa as officials work “blindly” to contain outbreaks BMJ August 29, 2024, 386 q1897; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.q1897 Whooping cough: What’s behind the rise in cases and deaths in England? BMJ May 17, 2024, 385 q1118; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.q1118 Dengue: Argentinians turn to homemade repellent amid surge in cases BMJ April 17, 2024, 385 q885; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.q885 Devolved powers for Greater Manchester led to some health improvements, study shows BMJ March 28, 2024, 384 q767; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.q767 Long waits in child mental health are a “ticking time bomb” regulator warns BMJ March 22, 2024, 384 q724; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.q724 Cited by... Editorial licence: what gets published and whyFulltext PDF
