It’s time to ban obesity in NHS employees
BMJ 2013; 347 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f4646 (Published 23 July 2013) Cite this as: BMJ 2013;347:f4646All rapid responses
Rapid responses are electronic comments to the editor. They enable our users to debate issues raised in articles published on bmj.com. A rapid response is first posted online. If you need the URL (web address) of an individual response, simply click on the response headline and copy the URL from the browser window. A proportion of responses will, after editing, be published online and in the print journal as letters, which are indexed in PubMed. Rapid responses are not indexed in PubMed and they are not journal articles. The BMJ reserves the right to remove responses which are being wilfully misrepresented as published articles or when it is brought to our attention that a response spreads misinformation.
From March 2022, the word limit for rapid responses will be 600 words not including references and author details. We will no longer post responses that exceed this limit.
The word limit for letters selected from posted responses remains 300 words.
What a brave letter! Yet, recently I heard of a hospital trust which successfully reduces staff absenteeism by providing physiotherapy sessions to prevent or treat back problems. So why not provide whatever is necessary to support overweight staff to lose weight?
However, since this is unlikely to be successful, why not make exercise sessions and low calorie meals compulsory – well, staff are supposed to set a good example to patients are they not? Of course a little training might be needed on how to deal with the paper work while doing press-ups, jogging round the roof and roller-skating along the corridors.
Then again, why not make it compulsory for them to give blood and be organ donors too? Hmm...Encouraging posters could exclaim, 'You know it makes sense!'
Hmm... soon the NHS could be practising what it preaches...Not.
Competing interests: No competing interests
I agree with the concept of being 'fit for purpose'. Many of the NHS staff are not able to perform their duties efficiently due to their obesity.
I suggest the canteen be on the top floor, to enjoy the view, with no lift. Job interview rooms being similarly placed with the waiting room on the ground floor.
I had a partner who advised me always to employ a thin (agile) cleaner, it has proved to be good advice.
Competing interests: BMI 23
Sir,
I agree in principle with Fouin’s call to “ban obesity in NHS employees”[1]. However, the author's aspiration is highly ambitious and obviously controversial. For the many existing NHS employees who are obese, the best we can do for them is to get them to acknowledge they are putting their own health at significant risk and then encourage them to improve their body mass index. However, whilst we can bring the horses to water, we cannot make them drink.
As Fouin suggests, meaningful intervention might be possible with respect to future NHS employees. There is good awareness in the NHS of Equality and Diversity, not least amongst those who sit on interview panels. Intriguingly, the Equality Act 2010, the UK legislation which dictates the agenda in this area, does not prohibit discrimination on the grounds of adiposity or body mass index[2]. In other words it is legal to discriminate on the basis of obesity. The Act describes nine “protected characteristics” e.g. age, race, sex etc. Body habitus is not a protected characteristic under the Law as it stands.
If people knew that the NHS could and would discriminate against obese job applicants, that would eventually alter the average body mass index of the NHS workforce. This will take a long time.
However a catalyst for change in the workforce could come from this age of austerity. The NHS is undergoing an unprecedented process of consolidation across the board. Where consolidation occurs, existing staff may find themselves having to apply for an ever shrinking number of posts. Potentially, if Fouin’s wish is granted, obese NHS staff will face a stark choice: lose weight or perhaps, lose their jobs.
Job security would be a menacing “stick” to wield against the seemingly insoluble problem of obesity, but desperate times call for desperate measures. Obesity is a Colossal public health threat; whatever carrots have been deployed by successive British Governments to date do not seem to have had any real impact.
Fouin has stimulated a much needed debate about hard choices. Let’s hope the politicians can match his audacity.
References:
[1] It’s time to ban obesity in NHS employees. Fouin F L P. BMJ 2013; 347:f4646
[2] UK Equality Act 2010. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/15/contents (accessed 29-07-13)
Competing interests: I work for Public Health England, for which tackling obesity is a policy priority area. However, I write in a personal capacity. I am not obese.
The group of people that work in NHS is a representation of the population at large. The idea of banning obesity in NHS will be regarded as dicrimination if such policy was to be put in place. All overweight individuals need education and motivation to enable them loss weight. Hospital should address what food they sell and prepare in their canteens. Physiotherapy units should make their facilities available to staff as drop-in centres for advise on excercise and weight control.
For most, it is probably now going to be an up hill task to engage in meaningful slimming programs due to their hectic work shifts.
What we need is to make PE compulsary for all children in schools. To employ adequate number of physical education teachers, and to provide adequate training facilities. Home economics and food technology in schools should be encoraged. Healthy children of today will grow up to be healthy adults of tomorrow. The time to act is now.
Competing interests: No competing interests
The author makes an interesting point that has, understandably, sparked some debate. He is not asking that health professionals be “perfect”, as some have suggested, more that they set an example their patients.
All health professionals who have face to face contact with patients have opportunities to influence their behavior. From surgeons to phlebotomists, we engage patients in conversation as part of our day to day activity. We can reasonable deduce from their appearance and odour (I refer to the distinctive smell of tobacco) whether they are obese or whether they smoke and we all know that smoking and obesity directly contribute to ill health. It is reasonable to assume that we may feel compelled to give advice to these patients who are choosing to jeopardise their health through their behavior; and indeed some of us are obliged and trained to do so.
However, how can we advise our patients to lose weight with any authority if we ourselves are overweight? Could we really have the audacity to give brief interventional advice to a smoker whilst smelling of cigarettes ourselves? I believe our integrity as clinicians would be damaged if we engage in such overt hypocrisy.
So the argument that the NHS should require their employees to have a normal BMI is, in my opinion, laudable. I think it could justifiably apply to all front line staff given the above argument.
However, although this may be applicable during recruitment, in practice it would be impractical to implement to existing staff or to those whose body habitus changes during employment. I have seen firsthand how difficult it is to implement a comparable policy within the Armed Forces. Despite having excellent physical training instructors and facilities combined with plenty of motivation and ample time, there are still soldiers who struggle with obesity. Moreover, there is the problem of those who’s BMI is, seemingly, out of their control due to co-existing medical problems such as back pain or lower limb problems. They could not be discriminated against due to their disability.
Additionally, do we really know enough about the science of obesity to let people's body habitus start dictating their employment in this way? The interesting essay by Gary Taubes1 would suggest not.
There is no doubt; we should do all we can to encourage NHS staff to set an example to the rest of society in terms of lifestyle and behavior on both an organisational and a personal level. How can we expect our patients to engage in healthy behaviours if we ourselves do not? But this is easier said than done.
1. Taubes G. The science of obesity: what do we really know about what makes us fat? BMJ 2013;346:f1050
Competing interests: Retired military doctor BMI 23.5
In the past I have expressed views similar to those of Francois Fouin but recognise any change would take a long time and would need to be aimed at future doctors not the present generation. I have worked with some excellent doctors who either smoked or drank heavily and also some who were markedly obese. We see obesity in a different light from the other 2 health threats for a variety of reasons, but perhaps we could start by seeing morbid obesity as a drawback for certain front line specialties and in those speaking publicly on health issues? (The present heads of the RCP and RCGP are outstanding examples of what should be our aims in this respect). I am similarly critical of politicians involved with the tobacco industry. Yet as obesity becomes our Society norm, it is perhaps too late to do more than make minor inroads into the problem.
We need to campaign more vigorously against the too close involvement of the food industry in health policies, and against those popular chefs who continue to promote unhealthy levels of eating and drinking. If anything there has been a swing in recent years to disadvantage those managing to keep their weight in a desirable range. Perhaps we should campaign to have some of the vast sums spent on obesity and its treatment to be re-directed to keeping the not-yet-obese in good health. There are no doubt those arguing that it is the obese doctor who is more likely to understand the problems of obesity - on the same argument those involved in the care of the elderly should be past retirement age?
Competing interests: BMI in desirable range
I'm glad the author of this article is not MY doctor! Talk about NO bedside manner or caring! Plus this article is ludicrous and discriminatory towards human beings! Being human IS to fault. Human is NOT perfect, unless this author is, but to even suggest such a thing is inhumane! We do NOT live in a communist country where things like this can be dictated!
I am a patient who goes to the doctor as needed, more so than others because I have a neurological muscle disease which makes mobility next to impossible as it brings on severe muscle spasms. So yes, I am an overweight woman finishing menopause (which brings on a lot of new changes), and there is nothing I can do about it except to COUNT CALORIES and range of motion exercise a few times a day "if" I am able. Unfortunately, that is not enough even as I TRY and I TRY only to now know Dr's STILL JUDGE ME because of it?!
This kind of enforcement, such as another Commenter stated . . . WHERE would it end? The patients would be upheld to the same, if not already! Inhumane!
One of the things I LIKE about Dr's is THEY are 'human' too, so you KNOW they will fail somewhere. Start enforcing things like this, and more WILL become enforced, invaded upon our privacy, and it will end up going to far. There ARE reasons things like this do NOT exist now. You cannot inflict something like this on HUMANS.
Again, how would this affect the patients? To be made to feel as perfection must be embraced at ALL times? This is where psychological disorders start to occur.
Please, excuse me, author, if you ARE so perfect and I am the one to miserably fail and NEVER be able to reach nor maintain such absurdity.
I am APPALLED at even the THOUGHT of what was mentioned in this article! Talk about discrimination, you have it!
If you implement a system of firing employees who are overweight, or don't eat a certain way, or who live a lifestyle that does not "meet YOUR standards" and that continued through to ALL OTHER PHYSICIANS, I would NEVER go to the doctor! I would feel INFERIOR to the HIGH standards of doctors!
Yes, I am 'just' a patient, but "I" would be under the scrutiny of ALL doctors, have MORE 'bad things' noted in my medical records, etc. The list goes on and on.
Competing interests: No competing interests
Given the dire need for more targets in the NHS, I am disappointed by the narrow scope of Dr Fouin’s suggestion. Instead of confining healthcare workers’ responsibility to set an example with regard to obesity we could include their engagement with other aspects of public health, such as their smoking habits, intake of alcohol, fruit and vegetables, whether they drive on journeys when they could cycle and whether their children are immunized.
For doctors these targets could be included in their appraisals and feed into revalidation and nhsemployers may want to look at whether progression in the pay scales should be dependant on achieving the targets.
On a more serious note, can I suggest that anyone who writes on obesity should include their BMI or waist circumference under competing interests?
Competing interests: BMI 35.4
Whilst I can understand Dr Fouin's desire to tackle the problem of obesity, I cannot agree with his suggestion of jeopardising an individual's employment status within the NHS because of their weight.
It is unreasonable to demand the suggested specific levels of health and fitness for NHS employees who, unlike the armed services, do not generally require these levels to competently perform their duties. This is indeed blatant discrimination.
Dr Fouin's proposal is the thin end of a particularly unpleasant wedge. Would we proceed to demand NHS employees must not smoke, never drink more than the recommended levels of alcohol, exercise regularly to certain minimum levels, only have specific dietary intakes, sleep set amounts nightly, and adopt appropriate work-life balances? We probably advise our patients about most of these issues, but often find it difficult to carry them out ourselves. Worryingly, the argument might even be extrapolated further to embrace perceived 'correct' ethical and moral behaviour and beliefs in addition to physical health lifestyles.
NHS employees should not be set up to be role models of 'perfection', whether it be related to their size or otherwise. If they were, I am sure most of us would fail miserably somewhere along the way.
Reference
Fouin F. Ban obesity in NHS staff. BMJ 2013;347:f4646
Competing interests: No competing interests
Re: It’s time to ban obesity in NHS employees
Whilst the healthcare system may at times feel like a lumbering machine, healthcare workers are in fact human beings and not automata. We have a life and priorities outside of work, we have health problems, we have life events. We are not some athletic, super intelligent, disease-free ubermensch and I hope that we never will be.
The most important qualities in healthcare workers is our ability to do our jobs, to care for people, to make the decisions we need to make. Being overweight does not invalidate someone's ability to do those things. To pretend that we are superior beings without the flaws of our patient population, is to alienate our patients - and I believe that patients who feel alienated are less likely to take a doctor's advice.
The author's approach is callous and not evidence based. In fact a recent study found that perceived stigmatisation of obesity increases the risk of obesity - so the employment measures suggested may have the opposite effect.[1]
How about instead of demonising the obese, we try to improve the health of the healthcare workers we have? Workplace social groups based around exercise, like a running club or 5-a-side football team, might improve levels of fitness while reduce stress in the workplace - exercise is known to have mood improving effects. And perhaps a less stressed out and overworked population of healthcare workers might be less burned out and more able to have empathy with those who struggle with their weight.
Reference: [1] Sutin AR, Terracciano A (2013) Perceived Weight Discrimination and Obesity. PLoS ONE 8(7): e70048. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0070048
Competing interests: No competing interests