Head To Head Maudsley Debate Does the emphasis on risk in psychiatry serve the interests of patients or the public? Yes BMJ 2013; 346 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f902 (Published 12 February 2013) Cite this as: BMJ 2013;346:f902 Article Related content Metrics Responses Peer review Related articles Head To Head Does the emphasis on risk in psychiatry serve the interests of patients or the public? No Published: 12 February 2013; BMJ 346 doi:10.1136/bmj.f857 Letter Time to change psychiatry’s frame of reference for risk? Published: 19 March 2013; BMJ 346 doi:10.1136/bmj.f1544 Head to headDoes the emphasis on risk in psychiatry serve the interests of patients or the public? No See more An adolescent with disabling abdominal pain BMJ December 07, 2016, 355 i6101; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6101 Maternal deaths from suicide must be tackled, say experts BMJ December 07, 2016, 355 i6585; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6585 Andrew Wakefield calls Trump “on our side” over vaccines after meeting BMJ December 05, 2016, 355 i6545; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6545 Electronic fetal monitoring, cerebral palsy, and caesarean section: assumptions versus evidence BMJ December 01, 2016, 355 i6405; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6405 Clinical commissioning groups will be rated on sepsis care BMJ November 25, 2016, 355 i6361; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6361 Cited by... Therapeutic risk-taking: a justifiable choiceAbstract Fulltext PDF Time to change psychiatry's frame of reference for risk?Abstract Fulltext PDF
