Editor's Choice Mid Staffs and mortality data BMJ 2013; 346 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f638 (Published 30 January 2013) Cite this as: BMJ 2013;346:f638 Article Related content Metrics Responses Peer review Related articles Feature How the message from mortality figures was missed at Mid Staffs Published: 30 January 2013; BMJ 346 doi:10.1136/bmj.f562 Editorial Measuring hospital clinical outcomes Published: 30 January 2013; BMJ 346 doi:10.1136/bmj.f620 Letter Two incorrect assertions about study of hospital standardised mortality ratios in the West Midlands Published: 05 March 2013; BMJ 346 doi:10.1136/bmj.f1088 Letter Editor’s reply to Ben-Tovim Published: 05 March 2013; BMJ 346 doi:10.1136/bmj.f1203 See more After Francis, what next for the NHS? BMJ April 10, 2013, 346 f2074; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f2074 Government’s initial response to Mid Staffordshire report BMJ April 09, 2013, 346 f2209; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f2209 Mid Staffordshire should lead to a fundamental rethink of government policy BMJ April 08, 2013, 346 f2190; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f2190 After Mid Staffs: the NHS must do more to care for the health of its staff BMJ March 07, 2013, 346 f1503; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f1503 Editor’s reply to Ben-Tovim BMJ March 05, 2013, 346 f1203; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f1203 Cited by... More questions than answers in Mid Staffs mortality investigationFulltext PDF Two incorrect assertions about study of hospital standardised mortality ratios in the West MidlandsFulltext PDF Editor's reply to Ben-TovimFulltext PDF
