Inhaled drugs and global warming: time to shift to dry powder inhalers
BMJ 2013; 346 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f3359 (Published 28 May 2013) Cite this as: BMJ 2013;346:f3359- Toby Hillman, specialist registrar, respiratory medicine1,
- Frances Mortimer, medical director2,
- Nicholas S Hopkinson, senior lecturer in respiratory medicine 3
- 1Department of Respiratory Medicine, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- 2Centre for Sustainable Healthcare, Oxford, UK
- 3NIHR Respiratory Biomedical Research Unit at Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust and Imperial College, London SW3 6NP, UK
- n.hopkinson{at}ic.ac.uk
It is five years since the Climate Change Act (2008) was introduced to ensure that by 2050 the United Kingdom cuts its carbon emissions by 80%. Despite this, atmospheric carbon dioxide levels have recently increased, passing the 400 parts per million mark. Although the potential impact of climate change on respiratory health is widely appreciated,1 it is less well known that respiratory drugs may be making a sizeable contribution to global warming because of the propellant gases used in metered dose inhalers.
The NHS has an annual global warming potential of about 20 million tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent (1 million tonnes of carbon dioxide is equivalent to 1000 kg or 55.6 billion L of carbon dioxide),2 which is about the same as that of Estonia. This constitutes about 3% of total UK emissions, which were 590 million tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent in 2010. Of this, only 35% is accounted for by heating, lighting, and transport, with 65% being due to procurement—the delivery of healthcare, including drugs.2 Respiratory inhalers are some of the …
Log in
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Subscribe from £173 *
Subscribe and get access to all BMJ articles, and much more.
* For online subscription
Access this article for 1 day for:
£38 / $45 / €42 (excludes VAT)
You can download a PDF version for your personal record.