Cost effectiveness of telehealth for patients with long term conditions (Whole Systems Demonstrator telehealth questionnaire study): nested economic evaluation in a pragmatic, cluster randomised controlled trial
BMJ 2013; 346 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f2065 (Published 28 March 2013) Cite this as: BMJ 2013;346:f2065
The authors of this paper, Catherine Henderson and colleagues, have told us of some transcription errors they made in the tables (BMJ 2013;346:f1035, doi:10.1136/bmj.f1035). In table 1⇓ the raw differences for use of “GP (home)”, “GP (surgery)”, and “GP (telephone)” services are incorrect. In table 5⇓ there are errors in the QALY value for the primary outcome in the telehealth group; the ICER for CESD-10; and the footnote text. There are also errors scattered throughout table 4⇓. The three corrected tables are here.
[CORRECTED VERSION] Self reported service use (contacts) and unit costs to be applied, across treatment groups at 12 month follow-up
[CORRECTED VERSION] Differences in costs* and effect between treatment groups at 12 month follow-up, from net benefit analyses. Data are mean (95% confidence interval) unless otherwise stated
[CORRECTED VERSION] Baseline characteristics of participants with available baseline economic data, at baseline and 12 month follow-up
Notes
Cite this as: BMJ 2013;346:f2065