Analysis
Stop the silent misdiagnosis: patients’ preferences matter
BMJ 2012; 345 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e6572 (Published 08 November 2012) Cite this as: BMJ 2012;345:e6572
Related articles
- Research Published: 28 May 2009; BMJ 338 doi:10.1136/bmj.b2159
- Editor's Choice Published: 14 November 2012; BMJ 345 doi:10.1136/bmj.e7745
- Analysis Published: 07 February 2013; BMJ 346 doi:10.1136/bmj.f659
- Editorial Published: 29 October 2013; BMJ 347 doi:10.1136/bmj.f6485
- Analysis Published: 02 December 2013; BMJ 347 doi:10.1136/bmj.f7066
- Letter Published: 20 December 2012; BMJ 345 doi:10.1136/bmj.e8291
- Letter Published: 21 December 2012; BMJ 345 doi:10.1136/bmj.e8556
- Analysis Published: 01 July 2016; BMJ 354 doi:10.1136/bmj.i3319
- Research Published: 29 March 2023; BMJ 380 doi:10.1136/bmj-2022-073711
See more
- Scarlett McNally: Small changes for better use of time and teamsBMJ April 10, 2024, 385 q812; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.q812
- End of life: Ombudsman calls for better training on DNACPR conversationsBMJ March 14, 2024, 384 q655; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.q655
- Ecuador becomes second Latin American country to decriminalise euthanasiaBMJ February 09, 2024, 384 q357; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.q357
- Canada shelves plan to allow medically assisted dying for people with mental illnessBMJ February 01, 2024, 384 q271; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.q271
- We must consider ageing and frailty when sharing decision making in intensive careBMJ January 18, 2024, 384 q116; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.q116
Cited by...
- Les soins primaires sous langle de la sante planetaire: Tenir compte de la durabilite environnementale est benefique pour les patients et les cliniciens
- Planetary health lens for primary care: Considering environmental sustainability offers benefits to patients and to providers
- Communication of anticancer drug benefits and related uncertainties to patients and clinicians: document analysis of regulated information on prescription drugs in Europe
- Explaining the negative effects of patient participation in patient safety: an exploratory qualitative study in an academic tertiary healthcare centre in the Netherlands
- Agreement between patients description of abdominal symptoms of possible upper gastrointestinal cancer and general practitioner consultation notes: a qualitative analysis of video-recorded UK primary care consultation data
- Shared decision-making in cardiac care: can we close the gap between good intentions and improved outcomes?
- Does the healthcare system know what to cut under the pandemic emergency pressure? An observational study on geographic variation of surgical procedures in Italy
- Treatment decision making (TDM): a qualitative study exploring the perspectives of patients with chronic haematological cancers
- Potential impact of encounter patient decision aids on the patient-clinician dialogue: a qualitative study on Dutch and American medical specialists experiences
- GPs use and understanding of the benefits and harms of treatments for long-term conditions: a qualitative interview study
- Implementation of a diagnostic decision aid for people with memory complaints and their general practitioners: a protocol of a before and after pilot trial
- Decision Analysis in SHared decision making for Thromboprophylaxis during Pregnancy (DASH-TOP): a sequential explanatory mixed methods pilot study protocol
- Clarifying Values: An Updated and Expanded Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- Decisional autonomy undermines advisees judgments of experts in medicine and in life
- Setting goals with patients living with multimorbidity: qualitative analysis of general practice consultations
- Experiences and reflections of patients with motor neuron disease on breaking the news in a two-tiered appointment: a qualitative study
- How often do both core competencies of shared decision making occur in family medicine teaching clinics?
- Rethinking medicine
- Eliciting patient values and preferences to inform shared decision making in preventive screening
- Clarifier les valeurs et preferences des patients pour eclairer la prise de decision partagee sur le depistage preventif
- Patient preferences for cardiovascular preventive medication: a systematic review
- Influence of disease activity on RA treatment choices in countries with restricted access to expensive, innovative drugs: a discrete choice experiment among rheumatologists
- Managing the transition (ManTra): a resource for persons with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis and their health professionals: protocol for a mixed-methods study in Italy
- Assessing medical student knowledge and attitudes about shared decision making across the curriculum: protocol for an international online survey and stakeholder analysis
- Do patients and health care providers have discordant preferences about which aspects of treatments matter most? Evidence from a systematic review of discrete choice experiments
- What are the decision-making preferences of patients in vascular surgery? A mixed-methods study
- Improving patient-centred care for rheumatoid arthritis
- Discordance Between Drug Adherence as Reported by Patients and Drug Importance as Assessed by Physicians
- Patient focused registries can improve health, care, and science
- From tokenism to empowerment: progressing patient and public involvement in healthcare improvement
- Delivering person-centred care in long-term conditions
- Factors influencing communication and decision-making about life-sustaining technology during serious illness: a qualitative study
- Variability in physician prognosis and recommendations after intracerebral hemorrhage
- Training primary care physicians to offer their patients faecal occult blood testing and colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening on an equal basis: a pilot intervention with before-after and parallel group surveys
- Development of a Draft Core Set of Domains for Measuring Shared Decision Making in Osteoarthritis: An OMERACT Working Group on Shared Decision Making
- Setting a research agenda for medical overuse
- Delivering health with integrity of purpose
- Qualitative approach to patient-reported outcomes in oncology: protocol of a French study
- A Call for an Evidence-Based Approach to the Heart Team for Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis
- Clinician-Patient Risk Discussion for Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Prevention: Importance to Implementation of the 2013 ACC/AHA Guidelines
- Recommendations on screening for prostate cancer with the prostate-specific antigen test
- When doctors and patients disagree
- Current practices in feeding tube placement for US acute ischemic stroke inpatients
- Medication management following first-episode psychosis in young people: a developmental approach
- Implementation of Shared Decision Making in Cardiovascular Care: Past, Present, and Future
- Ethical Approach to Surrogate Consent for Hemicraniectomy in Older Patients With Extensive Middle Cerebral Artery Stroke
- Palliative and End-of-Life Care in Stroke: A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association
- Shared Decision Making and Motivational Interviewing: Achieving Patient-Centered Care Across the Spectrum of Health Care Problems
- Shared Decision Making: Science and Action
- Shared Decision Making: State of the Science
- Using an Option Grid in shared decision making
- Importance of clarifying patients' desired role in shared decision making to match their level of engagement with their preferences
- Meeting the challenges of providing universal health coverage
- Let the patient revolution begin
- The Quality and Outcomes Framework--where next?
- Shared Decision Making: Examining Key Elements And Barriers To Adoption Into Routine Clinical Practice
- Time for a "patient's page" in hospital notes
- Bias control in shared decision making: still too many loose ends