Letters
The truth about sports drinks
The wrong approach?
BMJ 2012; 345 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e5429 (Published 14 August 2012) Cite this as: BMJ 2012;345:e5429- Keith A Stokes, senior lecturer1
- 1Department for Health, University of Bath, Bath BA2 7AY, UK
- k.stokes{at}bath.ac.uk
Heneghan and colleagues’ accusation of bias is based on certain specific criteria: lack of randomisation, lack of allocation concealment, lack of blinding, lack of intention to treat, and use of a surrogate outcome measure.1 These are important considerations in the design of any study, but they are not relevant to all study designs and to all primary outcome measures. To suggest …
Log in
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Subscribe from £184 *
Subscribe and get access to all BMJ articles, and much more.
* For online subscription
Access this article for 1 day for:
£50 / $60/ €56 (excludes VAT)
You can download a PDF version for your personal record.