Research
Impact of single centre status on estimates of intervention effects in trials with continuous outcomes: meta-epidemiological study
BMJ 2012; 344 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e813 (Published 14 February 2012) Cite this as: BMJ 2012;344:e813
Data supplement
Web Extra
Extra material supplied by the author
Files in this Data Supplement:
- Data Supplement - Appendix 1: definitions used for assessing risk of bias
- Data Supplement - Appendix 2: characteristics of included meta-analyses
Related articles
- Paper Published: 13 September 1997; BMJ 315 doi:10.1136/bmj.315.7109.640
- Paper Published: 05 May 2005; BMJ 330 doi:10.1136/bmj.38414.515938.8F
- PAPERS Published: 07 April 2005; BMJ doi:10.1136/bmj.38414.515938.8F
- Research Published: 07 September 2009; BMJ 339 doi:10.1136/bmj.b3244
- Research Published: 13 March 2008; BMJ 336 doi:10.1136/bmj.39465.451748.AD
- Paper Published: 01 January 2004; BMJ 328 doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7430.22
- Education And Debate Published: 03 January 1998; BMJ 316 doi:10.1136/bmj.316.7124.61
- Education And Debate Published: 07 July 2001; BMJ 323 doi:10.1136/bmj.323.7303.42
- Research Published: 13 August 2009; BMJ 339 doi:10.1136/bmj.b3128
- Correction Published: 16 April 2012; BMJ 344 doi:10.1136/bmj.e2711
- Research Published: 29 January 2013; BMJ 346 doi:10.1136/bmj.f457
- Research Published: 24 April 2013; BMJ 346 doi:10.1136/bmj.f2304
- Research Methods & Reporting Published: 28 August 2019; BMJ 366 doi:10.1136/bmj.l4898
See more
- Chemoprevention of colorectal cancer in individuals with previous colorectal neoplasia: systematic review and network meta-analysisBMJ December 05, 2016, 355 i6188; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6188
- NHS to fund large trial of pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV preventionBMJ December 05, 2016, 355 i6537; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6537
- Bill to boost medical research funding and speed drug approval passes US houseBMJ December 01, 2016, 355 i6498; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6498
- Alpha blockers for treatment of ureteric stones: systematic review and meta-analysisBMJ December 01, 2016, 355 i6112; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6112
- Sixty seconds on . . . solanezumabBMJ November 29, 2016, 355 i6389; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6389
Cited by...
- Key Principles for Conducting a Good Randomized Controlled Trial
- RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
- Post-operative patient-related risk factors for chronic pain after total knee replacement: a systematic review
- Imaging Registries and Single-Center Series
- Comparison of the efficacies of abatacept and tocilizumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis by propensity score matching
- A patient-initiated DMARD self-monitoring service for people with rheumatoid or psoriatic arthritis on methotrexate: a randomised controlled trial
- Has the difference in mortality between percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting in people with heart disease and diabetes changed over the years? A systematic review and meta-regression
- Assessing bias in osteoarthritis trials included in Cochrane reviews: protocol for a meta-epidemiological study
- Interpreting trial results following use of different intention-to-treat approaches for preventing attrition bias: a meta-epidemiological study protocol
- Assay sensitivity and study features in neuropathic pain trials: An ACTTION meta-analysis
- Influence of trial sample size on treatment effect estimates: meta-epidemiological study
- Comparison of treatment effect sizes associated with surrogate and final patient relevant outcomes in randomised controlled trials: meta-epidemiological study