Rapid responses are electronic comments to the editor. They enable our users
to debate issues raised in articles published on bmj.com. A rapid response
is first posted online. If you need the URL (web address) of an individual
response, simply click on the response headline and copy the URL from the
browser window. A proportion of responses will, after editing, be published
online and in the print journal as letters, which are indexed in PubMed.
Rapid responses are not indexed in PubMed and they are not journal articles.
The BMJ reserves the right to remove responses which are being
wilfully misrepresented as published articles or when it is brought to our
attention that a response spreads misinformation.
From March 2022, the word limit for rapid responses will be 600 words not
including references and author details. We will no longer post responses
that exceed this limit.
The word limit for letters selected from posted responses remains 300 words.
In reading the print edition of my letter to the editor, I discovered the direct quote, “Ginny Barbour, a senior editor with the PLoS group of journals, said one third of authors could not find the original data to back up figures in scientific papers when these were questioned,” lacked a reference. That reference can be found in the following Financial Times URL: http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/bc6f7204-3d1f-11e1-8129-00144feabdc0.html?ftca.... The Financial Times report, dated 1/12/12, was titled, "Misconduct pervades UK research," and was authored by Clive Cookson, Science Editor.
Sorry for the omission.
Re: The emperor is marching around buck naked
In reading the print edition of my letter to the editor, I discovered the direct quote, “Ginny Barbour, a senior editor with the PLoS group of journals, said one third of authors could not find the original data to back up figures in scientific papers when these were questioned,” lacked a reference. That reference can be found in the following Financial Times URL: http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/bc6f7204-3d1f-11e1-8129-00144feabdc0.html?ftca.... The Financial Times report, dated 1/12/12, was titled, "Misconduct pervades UK research," and was authored by Clive Cookson, Science Editor.
Sorry for the omission.
Competing interests: No competing interests