Research
Effect of editors’ implementation of CONSORT guidelines on the reporting of abstracts in high impact medical journals: interrupted time series analysis
BMJ 2012; 344 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e4178 (Published 22 June 2012) Cite this as: BMJ 2012;344:e4178
Data supplement
Web Extra
Extra material supplied by the author
Files in this Data Supplement:
- Data Supplement - Web table 1: Reporting of CONSORT for Abstracts items across journals in 2006
- Data Supplement - Web appendix 1: Segmented regression with one group—model to get an estimate of the difference between pre and post intervention
- Data Supplement - Web table 2: Parameter estimates from segmented regression models predicting the mean monthly number of items reported per abstract
- Data Supplement - Web table 3: Reporting of CONSORT for Abstracts items per journal in (A) 2006, (B), 2007, (C) 2008, and (D) 2009
- Data Supplement - Web appendix 2: Change in the mean number of items reported per abstract for primary outcome (0-9) over time (from January 2006 to December 2009) before and after the introduction of the CONSORT for Abstracts guidelines implemented in January 2008 by journal
Related articles
- Research Methods & Reporting Published: 24 March 2010; BMJ 340 doi:10.1136/bmj.c869
- Research Published: 06 September 2013; BMJ 347 doi:10.1136/bmj.f5248
- Research Methods & Reporting Published: 07 March 2014; BMJ 348 doi:10.1136/bmj.g1687
See more
- Staff wellbeing: NHS England expands support with 40 hubsBMJ February 25, 2021, 372 n559; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n559
- England’s clinical negligence system needs urgent reform, say medical organisationsBMJ February 24, 2021, 372 n551; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n551
- Covid-19: GPs could get extra funding to boost vaccine uptake in hard-to-reach groupsBMJ February 24, 2021, 372 n548; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n548
- Covid-19: All adults on learning disability register should be prioritised for vaccination, says advisory committeeBMJ February 24, 2021, 372 n547; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n547
- David Oliver: We can support primary care without blaming hospital doctorsBMJ February 24, 2021, 372 n502; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n502
Cited by...
- Impact of a short version of the CONSORT checklist for peer reviewers to improve the reporting of randomised controlled trials published in biomedical journals: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
- Intervention reporting of clinical trials published in high-impact cardiology journals: effect of the TIDieR checklist and guide
- Limited engagement with transparent and open science standards in the policies of pain journals: a cross-sectional evaluation
- Reporting quality of randomised controlled trial abstracts presented at the SLEEP Annual Meetings: a cross-sectional study
- Scoping review on interventions to improve adherence to reporting guidelines in health research
- Risk of bias assessment of randomised controlled trials referenced in the 2015 American Heart Association guidelines update for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care: a cross-sectional review
- Sackler Colloquium on Improving the Reproducibility of Scientific Research: Enhancing primary reports of randomized controlled trials: Three most common challenges and suggested solutions
- Interventions to improve adherence to reporting guidelines in health research: a scoping review protocol
- The STROBE extensions: protocol for a qualitative assessment of content and a survey of endorsement
- Reporting quality in abstracts of meta-analyses of depression screening tool accuracy: a review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses
- Reporting quality of randomised controlled trial abstracts among high-impact general medical journals: a review and analysis
- Effectiveness of a nurse educational oral feeding programme on feeding outcomes in neonates: protocol for an interrupted time series design
- Systematic review finds major deficiencies in sample size methodology and reporting for stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials
- Development of the Standards of Reporting of Neurological Disorders (STROND) checklist: A guideline for the reporting of incidence and prevalence studies in neuroepidemiology
- Eighth international congress on peer review in biomedical publication
- Avoidable waste of research related to inadequate methods in clinical trials
- Evaluating the feasibility of complex interventions in mental health services: standardised measure and reporting guidelines
- Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide
- "Hardly worth the effort"? Medical journals' policies and their editors' and publishers' views on trial registration and publication bias: quantitative and qualitative study