News Scientific misconduct is worryingly prevalent in the UK, shows BMJ survey BMJ 2012; 344 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e377 (Published 12 January 2012) Cite this as: BMJ 2012;344:e377 Article Related content Metrics Responses Peer review Related articles Editorial Research misconduct in the UK Published: 04 January 2012; BMJ 344 doi:10.1136/bmj.d8357 News Institutions must do more to eliminate research misconduct, meeting hears Published: 16 January 2012; BMJ 344 doi:10.1136/bmj.e446 News Survey of Dutch doctors finds evidence of widespread research misconduct Published: 20 April 2012; BMJ 344 doi:10.1136/bmj.e2898 Research Frequency of discrepancies in retracted clinical trial reports versus unretracted reports: blinded case-control study Published: 20 September 2015; BMJ 351 doi:10.1136/bmj.h4708 See more Constitutional symptoms in a young person BMJ December 07, 2016, 355 i5781; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i5781 The BMJ Christmas appeal 2016-7: Orbis, the sight savers BMJ December 01, 2016, 355 i6425; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6425 EU to launch new antimicrobial resistance action plan BMJ November 23, 2016, 355 i6328; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6328 A typical sign on a plain knee radiograph BMJ November 23, 2016, 355 i6021; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6021 An older man with thoracic back pain BMJ November 23, 2016, 355 i5786; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i5786 Cited by... Biomedical authors awareness of publication ethics: an international surveyAbstract Fulltext PDF Frequency of discrepancies in retracted clinical trial reports versus unretracted reports: blinded case-control studyAbstract Fulltext PDF Scientific Misconduct, Retractions, and ErrataAbstract Fulltext PDF
