Health and Social Care Bill 2011: a legal basis for charging and providing fewer health services to people in England
BMJ 2012; 344 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e1729 (Published 08 March 2012) Cite this as: BMJ 2012;344:e1729
All rapid responses
Rapid responses are electronic comments to the editor. They enable our users to debate issues raised in articles published on bmj.com. A rapid response is first posted online. If you need the URL (web address) of an individual response, simply click on the response headline and copy the URL from the browser window. A proportion of responses will, after editing, be published online and in the print journal as letters, which are indexed in PubMed. Rapid responses are not indexed in PubMed and they are not journal articles. The BMJ reserves the right to remove responses which are being wilfully misrepresented as published articles or when it is brought to our attention that a response spreads misinformation.
From March 2022, the word limit for rapid responses will be 600 words not including references and author details. We will no longer post responses that exceed this limit.
The word limit for letters selected from posted responses remains 300 words.
As well as legal concerns, there are issues of efficacy, and also moral issues. Much of the coalition government's rhetoric is based on Liam Fox's "Atlantic Bridge". However, the US based Commonwealth Fund report [1], has shown that the US system does not work in terms of improving longevity or health of the whole US population, and is more expensive than any other nation's. The retiring head of Medicare and Medicaid, Dr. Donald W. Berwick [2], has raised concerns about that system, citing overtreatment of patients, the failure to coordinate care, the administrative complexity of the health care system, burdensome rules and fraud. Perhaps these are similar to the concerns of the DoH Risk Assessment of this Bill, which the government refuses to publish, despite a ruling by the Information Commissioner?
Existing private health care organisations in Britain are alleged to have avoided UK tax by offshore manipulations [3].
Recent US social psychology research may also contribute to this debate. Passing by a homeless person without an offer of help leads to less moral behaviour afterwards [4]. In general, rich people seem to behave in a less moral fashion in general [5]. If ministers and MPs lose their positions in the forthcoming 2015 election, they would be entitled, as would any of us, to apply for non-executive directorships of private health care companies, as well as companies in other sectors.
[1] The Commonwealth Fund Commission on a High Performance Health System, Why Not the Best? Results from the National Scorecard on U.S. Health System Performance, 2011, The Commonwealth Fund, October 2011. http://www.commonwealthfund.org/Publications/Fund-Reports/2011/Oct/Why-N...
[2] Health Official Takes Parting Shot at ‘Waste’. Robert Pear.The New York Times. Published: December 3, 2011
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/04/health/policy/parting-shot-at-waste-by...
[3] Daniel Boffey, policy editor. Firms poised to take advantage of NHS shake-up 'avoid tax on their profits'. http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2012/mar/17/nhs-shakeup-health-firms-...
[4] C. D. Cameron, B. K. Payne. The Cost of Callousness: Regulating Compassion Influences the Moral Self-Concept. Psychological Science, 2012; 23 (3): 225 DOI: 10.1177/0956797611430334.
Retrieved March 18, 2012, from http://www.sciencedaily.com /releases/2012/03/120315110416.htm
[5] National Science Foundation (2012, March 7). Upper class people more likely to behave unethically. ScienceDaily. Retrieved March 8, 2012, from http://www.sciencedaily.com /releases/2012/03/120307145432.htm
Competing interests: No competing interests
Re: Health and Social Care Bill 2011: a legal basis for charging and providing fewer health services to people in England
The contrast between attempts at healthcare reform in the UK and US is disturbing. Despite President Obama's popularity and the undisputed fact that the US healthcare system is in need of reform, it has been a struggle for him to pass even the diluted version of his original bill, a version that many argue fails to address the fundamental problems that plague the system. In contrast, a UK coalition government which stumbled into power now has the audacity to push through reforms set to tear apart the very fabric of an effective, universal healthcare system. A multi-tier system already exists in the US and is difficult to change because so many groups benefit financially from the status quo- once a similar situation arises in the UK, which the current healthcare bill undeniably paves the way for, returning to an NHS which is universal in more than just name will be challenging indeed.
Competing interests: No competing interests