The difference in blood pressure readings between arms and survival: primary care cohort study
BMJ 2012; 344 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e1327 (Published 20 March 2012) Cite this as: BMJ 2012;344:e1327
All rapid responses
Rapid responses are electronic comments to the editor. They enable our users to debate issues raised in articles published on bmj.com. A rapid response is first posted online. If you need the URL (web address) of an individual response, simply click on the response headline and copy the URL from the browser window. A proportion of responses will, after editing, be published online and in the print journal as letters, which are indexed in PubMed. Rapid responses are not indexed in PubMed and they are not journal articles. The BMJ reserves the right to remove responses which are being wilfully misrepresented as published articles or when it is brought to our attention that a response spreads misinformation.
From March 2022, the word limit for rapid responses will be 600 words not including references and author details. We will no longer post responses that exceed this limit.
The word limit for letters selected from posted responses remains 300 words.
Another important reason to assess the blood presure in both arms on at least one occassion, is to determine which arm should be used in the future to monitor blood pressure and to assess any response to hypertension treatment.
If there is a significant difference in the blood pressure reading in each arm, this should be recorded in the patients chart as the higher reading arm should be the one used in future blood pressure measurements.
Competing interests: No competing interests
Another limitation of this study stems from the lack of specific data on arm measurements for women vs men, which renders a sex bias in any conclusions since we cannot and should not assume that study results are supported for women unless the data are stratified by sex to assess any gender differences.
Competing interests: No competing interests
Re: The difference in blood pressure readings between arms and survival: primary care cohort study
Difference in blood pressure between two arms: don’t forget vasculitis
I read with interest the article by Clark et al [1] and the related editorial [2]. However, the authors do not cite large vessel vasculitis as an important and readily treatable differential diagnosis when a discrepancy in blood pressure recordings between limbs is observed. For example, Takayasu arteritis (TA) is a rare granulomatous large vessel vasculitis and a difference in systolic blood pressure between arms of greater than 10mmHg is included in the 1990 American College of Rheumatology classification criteria [3].
Another very important clinical sign in TA is a reduction in volume or absence of peripheral arterial pulses, particularly the brachial. This is a common finding in these patients the importance of which, together with blood pressure discrepancy, can be overlooked both in primary and secondary care, often leading to a delay in diagnosis in a condition associated with considerable morbidity and mortality if left untreated.
Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is a considerably more common and well recognised form of large vessel vasculitis and may also cause a discrepancy in blood pressure between limbs and a reduction or absence in peripheral pulses. GCA and TA should therefore be considered in any patient found to have a significant difference in blood pressure between arms, particularly in the context of relevant constitutional symptoms, limb claudication and other ischaemic symptoms, or an unexplained persistent elevation in ESR and CRP.
1. Clark CE, Taylor RS, Shore AC, Campbell JL. The difference in blood pressure readings between arms and survival: primary care cohort study. BMJ 2012; 344: 19
2. Kim DH. Differences in blood pressure between arms. BMJ 2012; 344: 9
3. The American College of Rheumatology 1990 criteria for the classification of Takayasu arteritis. Arend WP, Michel BA, Bloch DA, Hunder GG, Calabrese LH, Edworthy SM, Fauci AS, Leavitt RY, Lie JT, Lightfoot RW Jr et al. Arthritis Rheum 1990 33: 1129-34
Competing interests: No competing interests