Rapid responses are electronic comments to the editor. They enable our users
to debate issues raised in articles published on bmj.com. A rapid response
is first posted online. If you need the URL (web address) of an individual
response, simply click on the response headline and copy the URL from the
browser window. A proportion of responses will, after editing, be published
online and in the print journal as letters, which are indexed in PubMed.
Rapid responses are not indexed in PubMed and they are not journal articles.
The BMJ reserves the right to remove responses which are being
wilfully misrepresented as published articles or when it is brought to our
attention that a response spreads misinformation.
From March 2022, the word limit for rapid responses will be 600 words not
including references and author details. We will no longer post responses
that exceed this limit.
The word limit for letters selected from posted responses remains 300 words.
It is time for women to stop choosing silicone implants.
There exist valid alternatives: saline implants are more anatomical, being tear drop shaped, are easily placed folded through much smaller incisions, are not toxic, are not proinflammatory, do not require emergency removal in case of rupture, do not require periodic MRI control scans, and feel the same, especially if they are placed behind the pectoralis muscle in order to avoid sensations of rippling. [1][2]
Re: UK launches inquiry into safety of PIP breast implants
Dear Editors,
It is time for women to stop choosing silicone implants.
There exist valid alternatives: saline implants are more anatomical, being tear drop shaped, are easily placed folded through much smaller incisions, are not toxic, are not proinflammatory, do not require emergency removal in case of rupture, do not require periodic MRI control scans, and feel the same, especially if they are placed behind the pectoralis muscle in order to avoid sensations of rippling. [1][2]
References
[1] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9vFyAEgqJSw
[2] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r4cR-1vQ9Y4
Competing interests: No competing interests