Intended for healthcare professionals

  1. News & Views
  2. Missing clinical trial...
  3. Missing clinical trial data
Editorials

Missing clinical trial data

BMJ 2012; 344 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d8158 (Published 03 January 2012) Cite this as: BMJ 2012;344:d8158

Related articles

ResearchEffect of reporting bias on meta-analyses of drug trials
ResearchPublication of NIH funded trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov
ResearchImpact of document type on reporting quality of clinical drug trials
ResearchCompliance with mandatory reporting of clinical trial results on ClinicalTrials.gov
ResearchUnderstanding why evidence from randomised clinical trials may not be retrieved from Medline
ResearchAssessment of publication bias, selection bias, and unavailable data in meta-analyses using individual participant data
PodcastPodcast: Elizabeth Loder talks to missing data research authors

See more

Cited by...

  • Target and actual sample sizes for studies from two trial registries from 1999 to 2020: an observational study
  • Subgroup analyses of the effectiveness of oral glucosamine for knee and hip osteoarthritis: a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis from the OA trial bank
  • Screening for prostate cancer: time to put all the data on the table
  • Re-evaluation of the traditional diet-heart hypothesis: analysis of recovered data from Minnesota Coronary Experiment (1968-73)
  • Trends in global clinical trial registration: an analysis of numbers of registered clinical trials in different parts of the world from 2004 to 2013
  • CONSORT extension for reporting N-of-1 trials (CENT) 2015: Explanation and elaboration
  • Why data sharing should be the expected norm
  • Discontinuation and non-publication of surgical randomised controlled trials: observational study
  • Impact of sending email reminders of the legal requirement for posting results on ClinicalTrials.gov: cohort embedded pragmatic randomized controlled trial
  • Discrepancies in autologous bone marrow stem cell trials and enhancement of ejection fraction (DAMASCENE): weighted regression and meta-analysis
  • Discrepancies in autologous bone marrow stem cell trials and enhancement of ejection fraction (DAMASCENE): weighted regression and meta-analysis
  • How should clinical trial data be shared?
  • The Limits of Evidence-Based Medicine and Its Application to Mental Health Evidence-Based Practice: Part One
  • FDA given new powers over data reporting to national clinical trials registry
  • Open science and reproducible research
  • A cost-utility analysis of transcatheter aortic valve implantation in Belgium: focusing on a well-defined and identifiable population
  • Are Published Papers Trustworthy?
  • Open Science and Data Sharing in Clinical Research: Basing Informed Decisions on the Totality of the Evidence
Back to top