Letters Institutional research misconduct Update from the editor BMJ 2011; 343 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d7890 (Published 06 December 2011) Cite this as: BMJ 2011;343:d7890 Article Related content Metrics Responses Peer review Related articles Editorial Institutional research misconduct Published: 09 November 2011; BMJ 343 doi:10.1136/bmj.d7284 Feature Managing research misconduct: is anyone getting it right? Published: 29 December 2011; BMJ 343 doi:10.1136/bmj.d8212 See more Constitutional symptoms in a young person BMJ December 07, 2016, 355 i5781; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i5781 What it feels like to be an interesting teaching opportunity BMJ December 07, 2016, 355 i6190; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6190 Author’s reply to Dangoor and colleagues BMJ December 05, 2016, 355 i6508; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6508 Time for guidelines on safety netting? BMJ December 05, 2016, 355 i6411; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6411 The BMJ Christmas appeal 2016-7: Orbis, the sight savers BMJ December 01, 2016, 355 i6425; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6425 Cited by... Managing research misconduct: is anyone getting it right?Fulltext PDF
