Cohort studies: sources of bias
BMJ 2011; 343 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d7839 (Published 07 December 2011) Cite this as: BMJ 2011;343:d7839- Philip Sedgwick, senior lecturer in medical statistics
- 1Centre for Medical and Healthcare Education, St George’s, University of London, Tooting, London, UK
- p.sedgwick{at}sgul.ac.uk
The association between adherence to lifestyle recommendations and risk of colorectal cancer was investigated using a prospective cohort study. Adherence to lifestyle recommendations was measured by a lifestyle index based on five factors—physical activity, waist circumference, smoking, alcohol intake, and diet.1
Between 1993 and 1997, all Danish men and women aged 50-64 years who lived in Copenhagen and Aarhus were invited to participate. In total, 160 725 potential participants were identified and 57 053 (35%) accepted the invitation. Of the respondents, 569 were excluded because they had recently been diagnosed with cancer. A further 997 respondents were excluded because of missing data, resulting in a cohort size of 55 487. Adherence to lifestyle recommendations was measured at recruitment. Cohort participants were followed …
Log in
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Subscribe from £173 *
Subscribe and get access to all BMJ articles, and much more.
* For online subscription
Access this article for 1 day for:
£38 / $45 / €42 (excludes VAT)
You can download a PDF version for your personal record.