Feature More Secrets of the MMR Scare Commentary: I see no convincing evidence of “enterocolitis,” “colitis,” or a “unique disease process” BMJ 2011; 343 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d6985 (Published 09 November 2011) Cite this as: BMJ 2011;343:d6985 Article Related content Metrics Responses Peer review Related articles Editorial Institutional research misconduct Published: 09 November 2011; BMJ 343 doi:10.1136/bmj.d7284 Feature Pathology reports solve “new bowel disease” riddle Published: 09 November 2011; BMJ 343 doi:10.1136/bmj.d6823 Feature Commentary: We came to an overwhelming and uniform opinion that these reports do not show colitis Published: 09 November 2011; BMJ 343 doi:10.1136/bmj.d6979 Feature Wakefield’s “autistic enterocolitis” under the microscope Published: 15 April 2010; BMJ 340 doi:10.1136/bmj.c1127 Editor's Choice Welcome to the new design Published: 09 November 2011; BMJ 343 doi:10.1136/bmj.d7299 Letter Where did the specimens come from? Published: 07 December 2011; BMJ 343 doi:10.1136/bmj.d7891 EditorialInstitutional research misconduct See more Institutional research misconduct BMJ November 09, 2011, 343 d7284; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d7284 Pathology reports solve “new bowel disease” riddle BMJ November 09, 2011, 343 d6823; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d6823 Commentary: We came to an overwhelming and uniform opinion that these reports do not show colitis BMJ November 09, 2011, 343 d6979; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d6979 Is research safe in their hands? BMJ January 19, 2011, 342 d284; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d284 Institutional and editorial misconduct in the MMR scare BMJ January 19, 2011, 342 d378; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d378 Cited by... Where did the specimens come from?Fulltext PDF Institutional research misconductFulltext PDF
