Research
Effect of using reporting guidelines during peer review on quality of final manuscripts submitted to a biomedical journal: masked randomised trial
BMJ 2011; 343 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d6783 (Published 22 November 2011) Cite this as: BMJ 2011;343:d6783Data supplement
Web Extra
Extra material supplied by the author
Files in this Data Supplement:
- Data Supplement - Web appendix: Protocol trial design
- Data Supplement - Web table 1: Manuscript quality assessment instrument
- Data Supplement - Web table 2: Adherence recommendation assessment questionnaire
Related articles
- Editorial Published: 14 October 2004; BMJ 329 doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7471.868
- Editorial Published: 29 January 1994; BMJ 308 doi:10.1136/bmj.308.6924.283
- Education And Debate Published: 04 January 2003; BMJ 326 doi:10.1136/bmj.326.7379.41
- PAPERS Published: 02 March 2004; BMJ doi:10.1136/bmj.38023.700775.AE
- Paper Published: 18 March 2004; BMJ 328 doi:10.1136/bmj.38023.700775.AE
- Research Methods & Reporting Published: 24 March 2010; BMJ 340 doi:10.1136/bmj.c869
- Research Published: 25 June 2014; BMJ 348 doi:10.1136/bmj.g3804
- Research Published: 01 July 2014; BMJ 349 doi:10.1136/bmj.g4145
- Research Methods & Reporting Published: 29 April 2021; BMJ 373 doi:10.1136/bmj.n857
See more
- Constitutional symptoms in a young personBMJ December 07, 2016, 355 i5781; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i5781
- The BMJ Christmas appeal 2016-7: Orbis, the sight saversBMJ December 01, 2016, 355 i6425; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6425
- EU to launch new antimicrobial resistance action planBMJ November 23, 2016, 355 i6328; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6328
- A typical sign on a plain knee radiographBMJ November 23, 2016, 355 i6021; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6021
- An older man with thoracic back painBMJ November 23, 2016, 355 i5786; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i5786
Cited by...
- Challenges in identifying and quantifying country-level participation in multi-country randomised controlled trials involving Ireland as a collaborating partner
- Complementary, Alternative, and Integrative Medicine Researchers Practices and Perceived Barriers Related to Open Science: An International, Cross-Sectional Survey
- Barriers to reporting guideline adherence in point-of-care ultrasound research: a cross-sectional survey of authors and journal editors
- CONSORT extension for the reporting of randomised controlled trials conducted using cohorts and routinely collected data (CONSORT-ROUTINE): checklist with explanation and elaboration
- Methods and results used in the development of a consensus-driven extension to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statement for trials conducted using cohorts and routinely collected data (CONSORT-ROUTINE)
- Mind the methods of determining minimal important differences: three critical issues to consider
- Comparing quality of reporting between preprints and peer-reviewed articles in the biomedical literature
- Effect of an editorial intervention to improve the completeness of reporting of randomised trials: a randomised controlled trial
- Impact of a short version of the CONSORT checklist for peer reviewers to improve the reporting of randomised controlled trials published in biomedical journals: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
- Do pharmacy intervention reports adequately describe their interventions? A template for intervention description and replication analysis of reports included in a systematic review
- Usefulness of applying research reporting guidelines as Writing Aid software: a crossover randomised controlled trial
- Endorsement of reporting guidelines and study registration by endocrine and internal medicine journals: meta-epidemiological study
- Scoping review on interventions to improve adherence to reporting guidelines in health research
- A randomised controlled trial of an Intervention to Improve Compliance with the ARRIVE guidelines (IICARus)
- La declaration RECORD (Reporting of Studies Conducted Using Observational Routinely Collected Health Data) : directives pour la communication des etudes realisees a partir de donnees de sante collectees en routine
- Sackler Colloquium on Improving the Reproducibility of Scientific Research: Enhancing primary reports of randomized controlled trials: Three most common challenges and suggested solutions
- Checklists and Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes
- The STROBE extensions: protocol for a qualitative assessment of content and a survey of endorsement
- The quality of reports of medical and public health research from Palestinian institutions: a systematic review
- Using reporting guidelines to publish paediatric research
- Reporting guidance considerations from a statistical perspective: overview of tools to enhance the rigour of reporting of randomised trials and systematic reviews
- State of reporting of primary biomedical research: a scoping review protocol
- ESPACOMP Medication Adherence Reporting Guidelines (EMERGE): a reactive-Delphi study protocol
- Research Reporting Guidelines and the New Annals Instructions for Authors
- Reporting guidelines for health care simulation research: Extensions to the CONSORT and STROBE statements
- Impact of peer review on reports of randomised trials published in open peer review journals: retrospective before and after study
- Relation of completeness of reporting of health research to journals' endorsement of reporting guidelines: systematic review
- Elevating the Quality of Disability and Rehabilitation Research: Mandatory Use of the Reporting Guidelines
- Assessment of the quality of reporting for treatment components in Cochrane reviews of acupuncture
- Reporting of harms data in RCTs: a systematic review of empirical assessments against the CONSORT harms extension