Intended for healthcare professionals

  1. Research
  2. Honorary and ghost...
  3. Honorary and ghost authorship in high impact biomedical journals: a cross sectional survey
CCBYNC Open access
Research

Honorary and ghost authorship in high impact biomedical journals: a cross sectional survey

BMJ 2011; 343 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d6128 (Published 25 October 2011) Cite this as: BMJ 2011;343:d6128

Data supplement

  • Web Extra

    Extra material supplied by the author

    Files in this Data Supplement:

Related articles

EditorialHonorary and ghost authorship

See more

Cited by...

  • No one left behind: a case for more inclusivity in authorship for quality improvement and implementation research
  • Authorship Trends in the Rheumatology Literature, 1990-2020
  • TeamTree analysis: a new approach to evaluate scientific production
  • Awareness, usage and perceptions of authorship guidelines: an international survey of biomedical authors
  • Scientometric Trends for Coronaviruses and Other Emerging Viral Infections
  • Have ignorance and abuse of authorship criteria decreased over the past 15 years?
  • Authorship Considerations for Publishing in Pharmacy Education Journals
  • A qualitative study exploring researchers perspectives on authorship decision-making
  • Ethical Shades of Gray: Questionable Research Practices in Health Professions Education
  • Intellectual contributions meriting authorship: Survey results from the top cited authors across all science categories
  • Transparency in Authors Contributions and Responsibilities to Promote Integrity in Scientific Publication
  • Author misrepresentation of institutional affiliations: protocol for an exploratory case study
  • Collaboration between academics and industry in clinical trials: cross sectional study of publications and survey of lead academic authors
  • Conflict of interest among Italian medical oncologists: a national survey
  • Transparency in authors contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication
  • The relation between publication rate and financial conflict of interest among physician authors of high-impact oncology publications: an observational study
  • Authorship, plagiarism and conflict of interest: views and practices from low/middle-income country health researchers
  • Thinker, Soldier, Scribe: cross-sectional study of researchers' roles and author order in the Annals of Internal Medicine
  • Publication and non-publication of drug trial results: a 10-year cohort of trials in Norwegian general practice
  • Authorship policies of scientific journals
  • Multinational teams and diseconomies of scale in collaborative research
  • Honorary authorship in postgraduate medical training
  • Productivity of authors in the field of diabetes: bibliographic analysis of trial publications
  • Author Financial Conflicts of Interest, Industry Funding, and Clinical Practice Guidelines for Anticancer Drugs
  • Raising Concern About the American Society of Clinical Oncology Conflict of Interest Policy Amendment
  • Systematic review on the primary and secondary reporting of the prevalence of ghostwriting in the medical literature
  • Honorary authorship in biomedical journals: how common is it and why does it exist?
  • Awareness and enforcement of guidelines for publishing industry-sponsored medical research among publication professionals: the Global Publication Survey
  • Should journals stop publishing research funded by the drug industry?
  • SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials
  • Why not switch to movie-style credits for research papers?
  • Honorary and ghost authorship
Back to top